Archive for the ‘the war’ Category

The Lie of Free Will versus New Creation in Jesus Christ: Case study : Economics Part One

Free Will and False Morality

New creation destroys the foundations of any morality produced by an idealized free will by the means of introducing new elements or changed elements on which the free will based morality depended. These new introductions of elements or changed elements as growth phases act as both replacements and as simple growth of the whole environment, pushing aside the placement of both physical and spiritual entities upon which were founded former concepts and spirits that were organized under the titles morality or ethics. The movement in the mind of the individuals, the changing of the individuals into new spiritual creatures and the changing of the overall environment in which non-new creatures in Jesus Christ and new creatures in Jesus Christ live, and on which a well organized, stable morality depended, acts to destroy the organization of that morality and thus the hope placed in it to be proof offered to God of goodness. The morality itself dissolves as its constituent elements / spirits are changed or even moved slightly.

It is not simply a matter of a change in basic principles and thus a swapping of ideology by the same creature in the same, unchanged environment such as changing religions or ethical patterns. Such a thing is never the case as new creation is on-going by God at all times. But the pretense of such self-change or idealized collective-of-autonomous-selves as societal change is a common theme of moralities that depend on free will and are only differing formulas for idealized choice among a group of elements idealized to be eternally static or changing so slowly that the change will in no way effect the idealized present choosier because of mortality. The morality as an end product of a lifetime of supposed choice is then idealized to be eternally beneficial expressly because the spiritual elements of total reality are idealized as not merely unchanging during the lifetime of the individual, but eternally unchanging; new creation is not only constantly denied by such a scheme, but is decried as the enemy.

Righteous morality before God is non-changing because those who have received grace only depend on the unchanging character of God Himself, the blood of Christ and the Word and Power of God. The free will based models of morality seek to mimic God’s never changing judgment that He performs in the midst of His new creation as if what God does is a principle of static power and environment by implying a free will that is never bound by anything and yet static elements that are as unchanging as God from which to build behavior that impresses God that one is supposedly righteous without the need for grace of God and without new creation in Jesus Christ. By the definition of free will morality, if God or any other thing out of which morality is built changes, the morality itself is overthrown; it morphs into something else when either the environment out of which it is built changes or the thing to which it is applied changes.

Thus some of the purposes of the lie of free will are seen: to deny a change in the creature ( oneself ) as being non-metaphorically born again in Jesus Christ, so that the idealized stable and eternally unchanging creature with its own versions of morality may seem eternal and thus relevant and to deny changes in the environment out of which the free will morality was formerly built. The lie of human free will must deny anything else can exist but the exact conditions that supposedly make it a fact that men have free will. The consequences of that denial are catastrophic to a successful life of the individual and society even in the present as they multiply hypocrisy and self-deceit.

By denying new creation on all levels, simply to protect the ideology of free will, reality is denied simply to have a false face of stability in which present belief systems that rely on a concept of free will can survive. That false stability is made to seem to produce morality to seem that the whole is an honest paradigm of being righteous. The individual deceived free will exists for men keeps saying “I have free will. I have free will.” while their actual environment closes in on them and they have not received the grace of God’s presence in them.

Over time, those institutionalized in the lie of free will grow afraid of new creation even as a concept and see it as their enemy. They are forced to deny its very existence as an ideological argument in order to carry forward an agenda of making everyone believe free will actually exists for creatures; the other definitions of parts of reality rarely mentioned that must be defined a very particular way in order for human free will to make sense are zealously guarded by adherents of free will based religions and philosophies and new creation destroys them.

Free will theology is not simply a religious phenomenon or a thing which only has religious implications. It applies to politics and society in every area as a stunting of creativity and as a xenophobia of creation, while claiming to be the sole path to personal salvation before God and economic prosperity. Yet it has as a ridiculous slogan “the entrepreneurs will save us” as if depending on the very change that destroys their carefully built morality in order to build future economic prosperity. As long as that change has new definitions in place that seem to mandate free will, all is well to maintain the illusion. But if not, the change is decried as heresy.

Calvinism is proved to be the honest truth of Jesus Christ that can be tested and found to be true over and over, even in the midst of new creation and ever changing environments, be they ideological or physical.

To change the definition of money necessarily changes the morality surrounding money, which bumps the table on which free will morality is busy faking righteousness and thus effects one’s eternal place of abode in those models .. but has no effect on Calvinism.

The present popular definition of money and trade is based on scarcity; not new creation of plenty. The idealized environment in which to keep the present definition of money in the public mind valuable is then static and one of artificially maintained scarcity for a supposed public good. The notion of fairness within the definition of money is also based on ‘spreading around’ what is idealized to be scarce and the whole farce of equality within those paradigms is destroyed by the simplicity of new creation in Jesus Christ: when every has Christ who is the source of life and new creation, no one has a need to maintain an assumption of a scarce product one must run out and buy before it runs out as a political paradigm and merchants who rely on a civil-rights/choice based marketing scheme are undone. The whole evil show is based on non-creation and a near worship of lack of new creation in order to maintain a free market model of ‘scarcity dictates price” in order to keep prices up and business pumping.

To change models of government equally destroys the former security of free will based morality ..and doesn’t touch Calvinism

Advances in technology destroy free will based notions of morality and safety of soul based on that morality ( and that is why you never see such advances as products of nations in which free will based religions reign: they all want to think their own models of morality are eternal and don’t want any change ) ..and never touches Calvinism.

Why is Calvinism unchanged and unafraid of change no matter the amount of new creation or paradigm shifts? Being new creature in Jesus Christ and the common sense of on-going new creation is the truth of Calvinism; not merely theorizing about it or hoping for it. Embracing in whatever manner is necessary what is actually new creation as reality is then the Christian lifestyle and indeed, expectation. In contrast, as previously shown trying vainly to hold on to idealized self-built morality by supposed free willed protectionism in favor of the ideological items out of which that morality was supposedly built is the standard lifestyle of all who are deceived they have even partial free will.

Those who are deceived they have even partial free will cling to the past and call it Tradition; are afraid of new things and end up destroying their own lands and each other in a fight that must take place because of the falsely idealized scarcity of basic needs. In the midst of a world financial crisis, which those who are hard core believers in free will have manufactured through their ideology and consequent actions, new creation and acknowledgment of God’s on-going new creation is needed, not simply a rearrangement of what already exists ( usually termed “a fair deal for everybody” ) while an on-going denial of new creation and in denial of God in Jesus Christ is maintained. Both a quick look and in-depth research demonstrates that hard core free willers who call themselves pro-Christ but love the lie of human free will and loath Calvinism have been the destroyers and usurpers of all that God has formerly created other than new creatures in Jesus Christ / body of Christ and are solely responsible for the present destruction and international tensions according to their own definitions of reality. If one actually counts the Calvinists among them, one quickly finds there are none. At best one finds a constant hatred of Calvinism and a lie of that it is supposedly Calvinism’s fault that monopoly capitalism is unrestrained. One even finds the outrageous lie that Calvinism is the philosophical and spiritual foundation for monopoly capitalism when in fact monopoly capitalism itself is totally dependent on and is defined as artificially maintained scarcity. Monopoly capitalism could only arise out of a hatred of Calvinism, the lie of human free will and the consequent reliance on denial of new creation in addition to a false definition of stability that provides such practices upon which monopoly capitalism relies to exist at all under any guise.

A real world example: A group of people with a notion of false moral stability which is based on an idealized absolute lack of new creation will be terrified if anyone mentions changing the definition of money, even as they must deny that the definition can be changed at all. It is a rule that those who profess that free will exists for creatures always have an area within their ideology that they assume others will think is ruled by determinism. Such things as the definition of money, grace, public policy and the like are the sacrosanct definitions that are presumed to be untouchable and on a level with natural phenomenon over which no free willed creature is expected to have power over. A very clear demarcation exists within free will ideology itself between ‘what a free willed entity can do’ ..within the bounds of an unspoken and very nebulously defined determinism that is implied to be synonymous with God’s predestination and election. What is changed when the definition of money is changed is an idea in the mind of a vast population and the fear based on that idea.

Questions those deceived free will exists must ask, in their most honest moments include: Who will be moral in the new paradigm of the new money? How will that new morality be recognized? How will it effect choice?

If they are religious they will also ask: How will it effect being righteous in God’s eyes? Where are the rules to live by in the new paradigm so that the individual will know with certainty that one is a friend of God?

All such questions are a consequence of being in a lie yet living in reality, which is the fundamental condition of fallen men. Being busied with such concerns seems to them to be both common sense and piety. Yet to even dare to breathe such questions by them is an admission of a deeper outlook they have that makes morality unreliable and that they actually have a reliance on a vague notion of grace that must be applied no matter how changes come about or what those changes actually are. But the grace they rely on as an adjunct to free will is to them, by definition, something that cannot interfere with the idealized free will and thus cannot be new creation of the creature that has the idealized free will and cannot jiggle the table on which is built their entire house of moral cards.

In Christ, as new creature, one sees one’s own new birth as favor from God and thus a trust in God is immediate. New creation is then seen as both a friend and, as part of the nature of God, a standard part of reality. The grace of God in Christ is well understood to be part of new creation and there is no reliance on a static, non-growing, non-creating environment in which to assure oneself by one’s own moral code as one’s own witness that one is a friend of God. The very elements on which such a self-witness must rely are constantly changing and growing. God then is the only reliable witness and those through whom He witnesses.

Romans 8:16 The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit, that we are children of God.

What we see is that any notion of free will, no matter how small or large, whether it is called libertarian free will or partial free will, manufactures a fear of reality as xenophobia and a total lack of creativity in addition to a loathing of creativity in others. Everything must remain as it is idealized to exist for the sole benefit of keeping intact a particular ideology in order for those old in any particular version of morality to idealize themselves as keeping the morality they have earned by self-will and constructed out of unchanging, immovable elements. If anything changes about themselves as creatures or about their physical and spiritual environment as ideology, the morality they have supposedly so carefully crafted for themselves dissolves in front of them and as such, their salvation of soul.

The mixture of a few admissions that new creation may exist, but viewed as merely a shift or mere combination of in some part of reality that already existed added to an idealized static morality only produces hopelessness and fatalism. Such people end up as zealots of the slogan ‘live for today’, denying even more of reality in the guise of embracing honest change. They are enabled to be honest enough to face the truth that changes occur, but in seeking to hold onto a paradigm of self-constructed salvation of soul via a free will, are overthrown in the face of that change. At best, they must start over in a new free-will based religion working to earn ‘another’ salvation in ‘another’ morality.

The scenario described here is being played out right now. It could only work if the general populace are deceived they have free will. Arminian theology / Roman Catholicism / Mormonism/Islam and the like exist to produce the exact kind of person required to fall for the traps described below. If you are one of those people pushing free will as a debt trap in a liberal then conservative cycle, you would necessarily want a religious outlook that includes everyone to ensnare the most. Your version of unity, human love and brotherhood would then be nothing more than a bald statement that you want every kind of human being ensnared in your trap and all thinking alike with no exclusions. You want them all deceived exactly the same way to the same extent and the only way to do that is make them think they are being righteous and saving their souls to think the thoughts that keep them in debt.

In addition, someone has you doing the unforgivable sin as default religious behavior ( equating the Word of God with non-creating speech/Satan’s speech ) based on a false purpose of eyesight argument that basically says if you see anything, no spiritual activity is going on. That means when you read the Holy Scriptures they are not holy to you and must be will-neutral to all human beings by the mere fact you saw text at all or at best you equate your experince of reading them to others who say they read a holy text of a different religion.

Propaganda like the 60 Minutes piece on seizures plays directly to that deception. A man in one scene says “Even into the 20th century some people thought seizures were evidence of demonic activity” and then later on in another scene a doctor is showing a scan of a ‘seizure in progress’. Lights dance in a certain portion of the screen and the reporter leans forward and points to the lights and says “Right here? This is the seizure?” as if the mere fact she is seeing anything ( and you are seeing anything over her shoulder) and what you/she are seeing is being described as electrical activity in the brain, that is supposedly proof no spiritual phenomenon can be going on in front of you. Basically, it is propaganda to instill an automatic reaction that if you see something, by the definition of sight, it wasn’t spiritual. That way, a ‘scientific’ explanation can be put over the whole, which itself relies on non-changing physical laws that rely on lack of new creation. Put that in the arena of reading and no text you ever read is supposed to be doing anything spiritual to you just because you saw it. ..which is the classic arminian/free will take on interpreting the Scriptures: because they can read it and look at text, by definition to them means it has no spiritual power whatsoever and thus they are able to do what they call interpretation ‘on’ the text.

God’s take on seizures: Mat 17:15-21 Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is lunatic, and suffers sorely; for often he falls into the fire and often into the water. And I brought him to thy disciples, and they were not able to heal him. And Jesus answering said, O unbelieving and perverted generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I bear with you? Bring him here to me.  And Jesus rebuked him, and the demon went out from him, and the boy was healed from that hour. Then the disciples, coming to Jesus apart, said to him , Why were not *we* able to cast him out? And he says to them, Because of your unbelief; for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed , ye shall say to this mountain, Be transported hence there, and it shall transport itself; and nothing shall be impossible to you. But this kind does not go out but by prayer and fasting.

The Apostle Paul was said in non-canonical books to have had epilepsy as the “thorn in my flesh because of the greatness of the revelation given to me.”

A people soaked in that kind of lie and propaganda as a false purpose of eyesight argument just to keep forcing them to say they have free will are easy prey for the following scenario:

The current false definition of money as a measure of freedom

summary: the lie of human free will and its connection with totalitarianism: free will is pushed as an inescapable public paradigm in the midst of a manufactured cycle of Big Spending Government and then Fiscally Conservative Government specifically to bring about a public illusion of morally obligated debt whether or not one participated in that spending; that feeling of obligation is directly linked to a perception of free will and money as a measure, representation and controller of that free will as being the sole expression of free will within the political arena per the propaganda. The Conservative portion of the show is implied to be both the foundation of reality and goodness and the iron bars of moral obligation while the liberal/spendthrift portion is the supposed experience of freedom that you pay for later in a more moral and stable environment; ..planned, temporary destabilization periods followed by reaping the benefits of the sown obligation to induce slavery as the norm and the expected norm as public, defacto religion


The current definition of money in the public mind as a product of propaganda that is maintained 24/7 365 by all means possible is one of a measure of human free will as a power grab by those who keep up the pretense of human free will. They are deceived people really have free will, there is no Creating Word of God at all, much less as distinct from non-creating speech and thus everyone is in a fight over limited resources: what already exists. A way to ensure your own enrichment in that atmosphere and within that mindset/spirit is to continually aggravate another person’s attention span that they have freedom that they are not taking advantage of and if they do not use it they will lose it. All current advertising fits easily within that paradigm. You cannot maintain such spending-for-freedom or spending -as-freedom over a long period of time and maintain the flipside of money as a measure of something scarce: that anything is scarce. The scarcity is the only thing that makes that definition of money valuable on a long term basis in a free will paradigm.

Money is plainly seen as a representation of freedom/free will and the speed with which to express that idealized freedom. The lie of free will is preached from every pulpit that despises Christ, every advertisement, and from the large majority of persons in the public to each other. Indeed, to say otherwise than men have free will brings almost certain derision. In short, the population as a whole is attacked with the lie that they have free will at all and the further lie that they are not using ‘enough’ of it, that attack is perpetuated over decades and centuries, which induces feelings of a storehouse of freedom that one cannot express ( because the illusion is that the freedom is real and would ‘work’ somewhere other than in the circumstances one is actually in..) and that lacking that expression of freedom one is both falling behind others who are falsely represented to them as heroes of the use of the idealized free will ( false history ). In addition it is falsely assumed in that lie that one has a valuable part of oneself that is not and cannot be used without an empowering mechanism. Money is the favored mechanism that is represented to them to be a tool the free will uses to express itself: it cannot be used alone but is meant to be used in public and thus becomes an automatic proof and evidence from one free willer to another that they have personal power and as such are ‘legitimate’ human beings. Above all else, free will is represented to be the default state of human beings, whether one liar says God forced it on us or another says evolution forced it on us. Money then becomes the mechanism of both proving to others that one is in the same default state of others and is therefore ‘really’ human and ‘belongs’, but also as a defense mechanism whose power grows with the amount spent.

The phenomenon of women loving to shop for things they don’t actually need but are merely trendy is easily seen as an enslavement to the need to supposedly express free will in the most benign way available to them. No one has to be confronted per se; items bought are a passive proof of personal power over objects. What is important is that the idealized freedom that is pretended to exist at all times is expressed even if on a kind of automatic behavior cycle that is piggy-backed on buying of items of necessity. The lie of free will in every way is loved by all merchants; is the fundamental paradigm of all advertising; is the reason merchants support very particular religious organizations.

Credit is not the equivalent of grace

Th notion of credit is then an easy enslaving device to those whose best honesty is that they have free will: one gets to supposedly prove the free will and the defense mechanisms of purchasing are kept intact; one stays ‘included’ in a world-system and thus supposedly proves worthiness to be considered human in public, while the money is imputed for a time as if it were the equivalent of grace and thus had as friendly a face as the god of the false grace free will preachers preach.

Times of big spending are then pushed as a public/governmental paradigm and when those deceived into debt on the premise they were exercising a freedom-on-a-timer have sufficiently fallen in the trap to keep them subdued until a large debt is repaid in the future, then a more conservative paradigm is pushed wherein the exact morality upon which the notion of free will depends dictates they remain in debt and do whatever behavior is required to pay it off even if they were not a beneficiary of what was spent. The liberal/wild spending spree followed by a more conservative outlook on that same implied freedom is a means of control that enslaves those deceived they have free will even if they are the party who profits monetarily and with, in essence, free labor from the cycle. The supposed persons in charge and who loan the money are afraid of those now in debt based on an understanding of reality that is entirely inside the definitions of reality that force the existence of free will as common sense; they are just as enslaved as the others.

The political cycle of Democrat/liberal/spendthrift followed by Republican/conservative is for the most part, a single group of people manufacturing such cycles and seeks to ensnare by government fiat the whole population regardless of whether or not one is a spendthrift or deceived by the lie of free will simply by participation in trade with money at all and being a citizen.

The massive bailouts of huge corporations that mismanaged their assets proves that an implied fiscal genius has nothing to do with who will be rich or poor but only those who pull the strings of a machine founded on the lie of human free will and who perceive their personal safety and safety of soul to stand or fall on concepts of free will. Business to such persons is merely a front wherein they define what is legitimate like franchises with no regard for morality or Christ while seeking to portray that Business is Christian by definition ..of human free will. It also served as propaganda to instill in the minds of the populace a paradigm of who-has-the-money are the Rich and whoever owes the money are the Poor as a moral paradigm regardless of actual morality. Drug lords and pimps can be legitimately rich in such a mindset and maintain their grip over populations and force children into their respective slavery with impunity. What is called justice and concepts of fair play is all based on the false scarcity that is necessary to maintain the notion of lack of new creation and thus the possibility of human free will.

Everyone knows that the massive portion of the funds loaned by the government went to those already wealthy and for the most part banks. That was no secret because it was never intended to be a secret. It was intended to be known in order to imply a seat of power wherever the money ( and by implication, the free will ) ended up and to make that power known as defacto god that forced all citizens into debt and who are now supposedly morally obligated to pay back those funds under a coming more fiscally conservative but in truth anti-Christian government with idealized higher moral standards founded on an idealized human free will, even though they never received any value for the money they supposedly borrowed or profited in any way whatsoever. According to false preachers and false prophets God or evolution forced free will on everyone, and suddenly an invisible wave went through the population and all the free will ended up in a Very Big, Heavily Guarded Vault that belongs to a select few. Literally, if it lives in the US, per the paradigm, it owes and specifically owes those who engineered the whole propaganda. Even to be the one who is owed they need the lie of human free will, in order to appear to be independent agents. It doesn’t do an aspiring slave master any good for the target population to know with certainty that they all only owe God in Jesus Christ and that there is no free will.

Those same persons have in past times maintained the concept/lie that free will exists and that it can be traded from individual to individual. Such phrases as “pool our sovereignty” ( in quotes gives 11,500 hits on Google ) and the like imply free will exists and can be given away, taken or traded as a commodity. Indeed, many have attempted to define victory in war as the taking away of a certain threshold amount of free will from the enemy, at which point the enemy is said to collapse. Money in such definition and debt schemes is then idealized as part of the propaganda to be the very device that takes free will from one and gives it to another thus being in the eyes of the deceived a measure of their own free will as well as yardsticks in supposed economic warfare.

If they owe money, they supposedly owe free will. That such phrases are spoken in other areas than debt is simply a bid to legitimize them by appealing to a supposed universality of their application; everywhere free will can theoretically exists ‘there the proofs of humanity are’ is simply an implied shorthand for ‘everywhere you are, since you have free will, you are in debt’. So-called pooling free will for good purposes as activism and charity are the favored legitimizing topics. Even then they are hypocritical as the causes they champion are anti-Christ. But having supposedly washed them morally by presenting them as the strength behind the will to give and be a charity, their definition of money then acts like a glue going through the target population and taking all the idealized free will from everyone who handles money at all. Even when you know you didn’t receive any bailout money and don’t have free will they must imply you are still a slave to keep their paradigm in place to control others.

The Democrats are there to get you into implied debt with credit; the Republicans are there to make you feel morally obligated and to make you feel that saying you are in debt is the ‘right thing to do’. Right now they are running a ‘values’ campaign while the implied debt piles up. The ‘values’ are never stated outright but generalized to be ‘fiscal responsibility’ coupled with a vague implication of ‘honesty’. The ‘values’ turn out to be responsibility for the actions of others in the guise of being the ideal citizen: taxation without representation and monstrous social policies mandated because we supposedly ‘pooled our free will’ in a credit cycle and now must obey the Ones Who Are Owed.

The lie of human free will is the road to self-induced totalitarianism by that very means. It slowly becomes the best honesty of the people who then are deceived that economic enslavement goes hand in hand with the salvation of their soul.

Jeremiah 9:4-8  Take ye heed every one of his neighbour, and trust ye not in any brother: for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbour will walk with slanders.  And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, and weary themselves to commit iniquity.  Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the LORD.  Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, Behold, I will melt them, and try them; for how shall I do for the daughter of my people?  Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; it speaketh deceit: one speaketh peaceably to his neighbour with his mouth, but in heart he layeth his wait.

Colossians 2:6-10  As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:  Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.   Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.   For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.   And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen


Iran and Syria? The manufacture of plug and play hearts in the war against the self

The manufacture of plug and play hearts in the war against the self

Isaiah 42:18 -25 Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see. Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the LORD’S servant? Seeing many things, but thou observest not; opening the ears, but he heareth not. The LORD is well pleased for his righteousness’ sake; he will magnify the law, and make it honourable.

But this is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore. Who among you will give ear to this? who will hearken and hear for the time to come? Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers? did not the LORD, he against whom we have sinned? for they would not walk in his ways, neither were they obedient unto his law. Therefore he hath poured upon him the fury of his anger, and the strength of battle: and it hath set him on fire round about, yet he knew not; and it burned him, yet he laid it not to heart.

These days there are a lot of articles and comments regarding Iran and Syria. The pro-Iranian propaganda among them is centered on the word ‘pretext’.

Supposedly, the Iranians are mis-represented nice guys against whom it is necessary to have a pretext to fight against. The word pretext is used in the sense of a ‘false reason’: to be the face-word/short-version of the accusation that America is evil against a moral Iran and Syria.

What is interesting to note is that those against whom the word pretext is thrown have manufactured their own monster than now attacks them. Having bought into such lies as “all religions are the same”, “truth is relative” and essentially that truth is not a Who ( Jesus Christ ) but a what ( an abstract that changes over time..) the grounding in truth that forms the righteous base from which to act in Christ has been abandoned. What is left is a wilderness of whateverism in which the adherent is to drift with desire as desire blows here and there. Now it is impossible for the White House to say that the Iranians are lying about their nuclear weapons program because they are Islamic and Islam mandates lies against other religions or that nuclear technology was stolen from us in America by the Russians and Chinese then illegally and immorally spread as fast as they could get it to their godless neighbors for the express purpose of using it against us. After all, the paradigm of the political manipulators is that all religions worship the same god and are morally equal, and that the nations who stole from us and then subsequently sold or gave away our technology have a legitimate right to them and the proceeds they obtained. They have said so by a multitude of means and called those means the very definitions of human relations, legality and morality. They have long treated the thieves as moral equals in every photo op they could manufacture.

So now, when an American or a Brit would say “We developed the oil fields in the middle east. All of them. We developed the expertise, the market for oil, the thing that made oil valuable, the means of getting the oil to market all over the world and it was stolen from us by those who now want to use the money it raises and nuclear technology we developed as well to kill us. Enough is enough.”.. those who are victims of the very lies that treat thieves, liars, homosexuals and abortionists as the moral equals of righteous people before Christ merely reply something to the tune of “you have yourself made legally binding treaties with those you now call immoral as if they were moral and righteous equals before God because you wanted to imply divine authority to imply legal veracity and you have yourselves at the least implied that technology belongs to everyone equally on that same basis. You have said and done these things for decades. You called such things triumphs of understanding and milestones of human history.”

So the erstwhile American or Brit who has abandoned Christ and yet seeks to make policy initiatives even for legitimate self-defense has to find a reason to do what is moral and righteous but explain it within the confines of past lies about reality they have worked day and night to make moral imperatives as law. In fact, they need a pretext only and exclusively if they want to maintain those past lies as if they were truth.

No pretext is necessary in Christ. Thieves and murderers get righteous justice executed upon them by the means of the righteous. The Iranian and Syrian regimes are thieves, murderers and liars supported by other thieves murderers and liars like the Russian and Chinese governments. That is well known.

Quick: give me a reason to take back what was stolen from us and prevent the murder of Americans on American soil and all over the world ..that keeps intact the lie that money is a physical representation of idealized human free will, the lie that one man can insert his Johnson into another man’s ass and then the two of them have a moral right before God to get married, the lie that children in the womb are not human beings, the lie that anyone has a right to die, the lie that one person has a right to any amount of another person’s money or life or anything whatsoever that belongs to another person, the lie that people from a foreign country can come to America and are legitimately due medical treatment, education, housing and jobs, the lie that god is whatever you want him –or her– to be, the lie that God, Satan and men share a common speech and the lie that you get to choose who you prefer to be God He can save you from ..something.

( the sound of crickets chirping…)

Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero. Null.

There is no such reason. In order to do all that, you need something called a pretext.

And that is exactly where the Republicans and Democrats and Brits are and what they are trying to do.

The justice that needs to be executed on Iran and Syria and all those who continually back them and who continually seek to portray that Islam is holy or true or has any connection with reality other than to exist in reality as an abomination of lies does not need a pretext.

But it does need honest men before God. It needs people who under no circumstances are running from God’s justice in their public or private lives. Indeed, God has died to make sure we are clean in His eyes from the necessity of His justice that He will execute against the wicked ..and we know it. There are no secrets that if found will destroy us before Him.

But the people who pretended to be Christians, who said that Christianity was an ideal model of behavior done in free will; was about being weak, about forgiving everyone of everything no matter what; about treating lies as equal with the truth, who said that the smart people go to heaven and the dumb people go to hell, and that men had free will ..those people can never do justice because they are secretly guilty and fear discovery even if they are publicly proud. So, those people will manufacture lies about Iran and Syria that they don’t need to manufacture lies about for anyone to understand the Iranians and Syrians are evil. They will manufacture those lies in order to keep their other lies intact; so they keep being legit to all those they have deceived on other issues.

That way, when the liars who seek to portray Iran and Syria as mis-understood moral giants who get to keep anything they can steal and those who help them as badly masked superheroes, when those persons catch the press-puppet Defenders of Freedom in one of those lies, everyone involved can feel guilty and point the finger while the Iranians build nuclear weapons.

The common sense of the deceived is to look for some other reason to know something is just and righteous other than what is very plainly just and righteous; the common sense has to match the former lies they were told and which they rejoiced to nurse in order for them to recognize it, much less to be warned by it into even legitimate self-defense.

First they were told they had free will. Then they were trained without being told that money is speed; that if you have money, you can supposedly make choices and thus supposedly prove your personal power. All their lives they have been victims of a lying theater that supposedly demonstrated they had free will and only needed the ‘x’ item to prove and re-prove it over and over just for the sake of doing it and if they failed to keep ideally proving it again and again they were heretics of the human race: they need the money, the circumstance, the time only for that purpose. When the money is short, the Cause arises in which to plug the heart that must, like an addict, ‘do’ the ‘proof of free will’. Here comes “Iran and Syria.” What difference does it make if you are supposedly such vapid things as ‘for war’ or ‘against war’? What matters is that you get to play in the Cause and plug in your ever-ready heart.

You have for so long committed propaganda against God by committing propaganda against yourselves that you are very adept at seeing the propaganda in another and never seeing Christ.

Too bad for you justice doesn’t need propaganda or to reverse engineer propaganda in order to be said to have been done.

A very big ass crack is going to open up and take a dump over all your little best beliefs very soon. Not the things you have doubts about or the things you supposedly know are wrong. On all your best honesty; the things you thought made you righteous; the things you were so ready to use as proofs of your own worthiness in the popular paradigm of your day.

Those in Christ know that that event, for the elect is called: Salvation. One part of being genuinely saved is to have all your personal deceptions involuntarily taken from you and then have the fact you used to have them thrown in your face 24/7 365 both by seeing them in others and having a recompense for having had them oneself.

Those who will never be saved will be crushed by it.

So if you are reading this and suddenly have an epiphany that your lie of free will and your sodomy loving ways and hatred of the womb are all wrong: you just got saved. Look to Christ who saved you. In that understanding, you can look at Iran and Syria, Russia and China, and understand we need help from Christ right now to do His justice immediately.

If not, and you really think such a thing as ‘homophobia’ exists and that killing children is “about women’s rights”, that Mary is a virgin and the Book of Mormon is true, that you get to chose if you actually go to heaven or the lake of fire, whether you know it or not, that is God’s way of saying “Fuck you.” A tank could smash into your living room and you would only say “This isn’t happening because my ideology says it is impossible, and a tank in my living room isn’t something a “compatiblist” could explain and keep homophobia as a concept intact.” At best you’ll call on Mary and lose or call on tradition and lose.

You can even mis-apply such truisms as “some people send other people off to war so they can get their land while they are gone” or “young men fight the wars of old men” or “men do the fighting and women the crying”. But only you are harmed the more lies you tell no matter what ‘side’ you are on.

I respect and pray for you in Christ’s truth concerning who and what you are. Your version of you can kiss my ass and doesn’t get one second of prayer.

Proverbs 1:22 -32 How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge? Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you. Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh; When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you. Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me: For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD: They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices. For the turning away of the simple shall slay them, and the prosperity of fools shall destroy them. But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Islam, False Determinism and Kufu

Islam and False Determinism as both idealized freedom from political and spiritual oppression by unseen spiritual enemies …and the resulting Kufu

False determinism is that lie that claims to be a factual revelation of God’s will and the nature of God as God when God is conducting affairs concerned with what He Himself created. These include human affairs but are not limited to human affairs.

In Islam, the nature of God as creator is factually represented, but in a speech which itself can create nothing and as if that creation ended at some convenient time in the past leaving the ideal Muslim free to do as they please in the present. Thus the endless threats, motivational speeches and twists in Muslim societies that make the sloganized signs of the Free Will Bible Belt Christian Churches look positively quaint. Their choices in the present are then said to be the key to future amounts of free will they supposedly receive if they do what they are told by the religious specialists who, at least in theory, know more about the idealized determinism than their neighbors. Just like the Free Will Bible Belt Churches.

Case in point: the idea of Kufu, sometimes called compatibility-in-marriage. Who can marry whom.

The religious specialists are specialists who, it turns out, are really only good at protecting their specialty. What better way to protect one’s specialty than to say who can marry into it? It is one thing to need new adherents as the old ones die. But in free willed religion, you need a certain animal to not rock the boat by having to be trained in the rudiments of the new religion in such a way that would never ask the questions that a native in those rudiments would never think to ask either. You need a bare minimum yes-man or yes-woman that you can move forward with that has a certain threshold of shared beliefs about reality, not someone with whom you have to make all your lies make sense when viewed against the backdrop of their former deceptions. How do you prove to someone who thinks Shiva is the all-merciful that in fact Shiva doesn’t exist and Allah is the all merciful? They are willing to concede that it may be true, because, well, the woman they wish to marry is really, really pretty and her father has lots of money. He just needs a little nudge.

After all, because they all live in the lie of free will and that money is a measure of that exact free will and if this Allah guy can give him a little more freedom than Shiva ( is that mercy or what?) then that god is in fact the mecrcifulest. So the title is up for grabs in the overall paradigm of Free Will and Money-as-Freedom. Just answer a few simple questions and after that the new adherent is saying “Where do I sign?” and “Isn’t she beautiful?”

But those few simple questions are the rub. How do you get the other guy out of cage he isn’t really in but thinks of as real and he is saying he is trying to reach out to you through the bars and that reaching through those bars is painful for him? In his mind, he is offering you a real olive branch at the cost of personal sacrifice. Look in his eyes. He ain’t kiddin’. All you have to do is say it is real while preserving the integrity of Islam.

Those pagan-to-other-pagan converts can be tricky.

“So there I was, dashing through the Koran, searching out compatibility issues. I gotta tell you –I was sweating bullets. But then, as if a revelation, I saw in the sky, ..not a bird, not a plane, but faster than a speeding bullet. It was kufu. It said this guy was too dumb to convert and that would bring saddness to his children once they were married. His mind wasn’t right. Is Allah the most merciful or what? I told him it was pre-determined by God that our families were incompatible, the proof was that he had put us in different religions and occupations and that because Allah had halted creation in order to preserve everyone’s free will, that had the side effect of limiting resources, one of which was beautiful women from my family who possessed a certain liberal mode of thinking. So while the wonders of Allah’s demonstration of powerlessness were wise, ( is he not, not ashamed to shame himself for our benefit?) in that that powerlessness provides the stable character of our environment in which to have free will and not be interfered with by new creation, unfortunately that results in sacred scarcity (on which we rely to know what is valuable), but also that there are some things of which there just are not enough to go around.

So the guy looks at me like I’m a moron and says that I have claimed for Allah what Shiva wrote about herself/himself ( I’m not sure. I don’t recall what exactly he said on that.. ) thousands of years before Islam ever existed. Can you believe that?! I was glad he got mad so the whole thing was off. But still , I mean. C’mon. Shiva? Can be as smart about and as merciful with her powerlessness as Allah? What? That’s the same thing the Catholic missionaries tried to say about Mary. These guys never quit! Kufu is truly a miracle defense!”

That false determinism is set up to as a defense for free will is without question even as the pretense is that free will and determinism are diametric opposites and one excludes the other as controlling arguments in other arenas. There can be no new creation within non-creating notions of determinism right now or free will is ruined. The exaltation of the powerlessness nature of false gods goes hand in hand with the lie of free will: they claim to have created all that is, but have halted all new creation so that supposedly, men can decide for themselves whether or not they would prefer to live in paradise or be roasted in a fire for all eternity. The rules for supposedly proving one’s decision on that are simply broken down like franchises in which non-creation and scarcity are claimed as benevolence to know what is valuable.

In the end, Kufu is simply a stab at claiming determinism is interfering with or at the least guiding free will in such a way as to both claim to have free will and yet not be responsible enough with it to upset the emotional rules between men in that common free will economy.
“My daughter or son can’t marry your son or daughter because determinism is involved.” Kufu is nothing more than a shield for Arabs and Hindus to get out of being called racist while promulgating Islam or Hinduism with a landlord mentality and not be seen as regarding those who convert as automatically inferior.

In seeing it as such and wanting to not be seen as racists, what is the point of continuing in Islam when it no longer helps you protect your family from objectionable marriages? The very protection invokes resentment in the ignorant anyway because of your other lies on free will. Playing the game of “determinism ( which is really non-creating determinism and is a lie ) is forcing my free will on this one issue but leaving me and you free in other areas” and merely calling that ‘determinism’ by another name so as to appear not have motives but only be a victim of the gods isn’t working out for Islam or Hinduism and the only recourse they have is to be violent to appear to have some valuable trait as supposed strength. In the end, you were just a person trying to protect your family from bad marriages by the means of a type of emotional nuclear option that no one would question and excuse you from the normal rules of human emotion combined with non-creating speech and the lie of human free will.

It is much better to see that for a time, God forced you into a false religion, protected your family as a unit by the means of that false religion while not at all excusing its actions in you, and now saves you out of that situation and saves your family as well in new creation in Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God. That false religion and all the spirits of it will go to lake of fire.

Jeremiah 16:11-21 Then shalt thou say unto them, Because your fathers have forsaken me, saith the LORD, and have walked after other gods, and have served them, and have worshipped them, and have forsaken me, and have not kept my law; And ye have done worse than your fathers; for, behold, ye walk every one after the imagination of his evil heart, that they may not hearken unto me: Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night; where I will not shew you favour. Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that it shall no more be said, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; But, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither he had driven them: and I will bring them again into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Behold, I will send for many fishers, saith the LORD, and they shall fish them; and after will I send for many hunters, and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the holes of the rocks. For mine eyes are upon all their ways: they are not hid from my face, neither is their iniquity hid from mine eyes. And first I will recompense their iniquity and their sin double; because they have defiled my land, they have filled mine inheritance with the carcases of their detestable and abominable things. O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit. Shall a man make gods unto himself, and they are no gods? Therefore, behold, I will this once cause them to know, I will cause them to know mine hand and my might; and they shall know that my name is The LORD.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Flash Fiction/Parables: Taking Poisonous Candy from Babies

September 23, 2011 2 comments

I have a desire. Quick! What should I do with my free will?

Joann wants to marry a Muslim man. After all, he gets welfare from the US government and oil corporations in the form of university scholarships, cash and jobs. He gets tractors and gasoline to grow heroine with and infrastructure contracts in Pakistan to lie to the CIA. He gets free schools in his village; free medical and dental all around. But she is not an Arab or a Hindi. He lives such a cushy life. Everybody wants to give him something. Even democracy. Her family has created jobs in the past for other people. She has never received welfare. Heck, her family paid it to others. What of Nikah and Kufu?

Ah, my daughter, not to fear. Remember and live by the golden saying of Ahmadi Bawadi. “Any person, particularly any Muslim who gets what they want is undeserving of heaven. Desires corrupt the heart; particularly desires accomplished. Man is wicked and needs only the guidance of Allah. Any other is a distraction. So it should be with holy women. Think of the happiness of your family.”

Mark 3:24-26  And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.  And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

The New economy versus False Determinism, Uniformitarianism and the Old Definition of Money

September 23, 2011 1 comment

Key notes:

Denial of new creation is the key to making a false determinism and supposed uniformitarian character to spiritual history seem a legitimate and necessary foundation for a stable definition of money within the lie of free will.

The Lie of Free Will seems to provide the supposed necessity for an economy at all: trade of scarce items between individuals (perpetually limited resources because of the idealized environment in which non-creating speech is the only speech) /transactions are the supposed evidence of acts of free will performed and the act supposedly performed that proves free will supposedly proves freedom.

Determinism in non-creating speech is the implied situation of perpetuity of non-creation, limitation and scarcity .. by decree of gods.

Uniformitarianism within the lie, provides more stability to the lie by an implied backwards compatibility with all of history and supposed golden age of trade and riches: “it has worked in the past, is working in the present and will work in the future.”

A new economy will only arise after those lies are defeated ( the lie of free will, as well as all the other lies needed to make the lie of free will seem to make sense ) even as they will hang around on the fringes of society. God creates His Own opposition and the gospel of Jesus Christ, the truth that brings new creation and an economy of new creation, was never meant to be spoken in the midst of no opposition. We are to destroy lies wherever we find them as giving no place to Satan. But a total destruction of lies and evil will not take place until the return of Christ and a thousand years after that, exactly as Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God as Creating Speech has said.


A truly new economy is being built on a truly new understanding of money. That new understanding of money is built on the understanding and expectation of new creation in and of Jesus Christ. The new economy is expanding as a quality of Jesus Christ himself. There is no thought of money as a supposed measure or proof of personal free will or freedom in that economy. Need as opposed to emotion is the driving force of expenditure.

The old economy and the lies sent to destroy it is easily seen to have ended because of a non-creating mindset based on human speech/non-creating speech, human emotion and their limitations. In particular, the old economy was built on the lie of buying what you do not need simply for the sake of experiencing the supposed proof that you had free will by an act of trade. It forced production for the sake of filling orders that were based on such deceptions. It has made harsh use of the land in agriculture, resulting in particular in the land not resting but simply being used every year, season after season with no respite and not being allowed to be fallow one year in seven.

What has happened to the land has also happened to the human heart of those in that old economy. They are forced to feel as if any situation that arises that does not feed a frenzied consumption and production of emotion is necessarily one which, perhaps not being evil, sets them behind the emotional experience and understanding of others who are advertised to them to be smarter and wealthier because of that exact lack of rest. While they cry “BORiiiing!” to a lack of emotional stimulus, what they really mean is fear of their neighbor gaining more education in the lie while they are out of School. The lie that brought down the old economy was not one of ignorance to produce real goods or even a lack of necessary new inventions. It was the lie that the work itself and the product, the manufacturing and farming of the economy, was purely emotional and one of comparison with one’s neighbor in a non-creating mindset that fatalistically said that was the only possible life because “People have free will. They want to prove and express that will. That’s just how it is.”

Abortion was supposed to have been a solution to how one goes about increasing speed to catch up to others who had more emotional experience and as poverty insurance: any perceived impediment to having the money to trade with in order to prove one’s will was free was attacked, even the womb. The simple reality that more people means a larger and more prosperous economy was thrown aside in a rush to worship limitation and scarcity, as the Unique Thing became the In Thing to have emotional experience about and hopefully be the only one in one’s group of friends and family to have such experience. There were no exceptions. Even death was welcome as abortion, suicide attempts, and the offer to help others kill themselves. Shaming oneself through tattoos and body mutilations, patterns of speech that identified one as an outcast or wannabe outcast were welcomed by youth in attempts to gain emotional experience in the economy that implicitly claimed emotion was its real, national product and only wealth. “How to gain as much sympathy as black people, Afghan farmers,  Islamic militant warlords, Pakistani Intelligence, and illegal immigrants and get the same results in cash and jobs” was the unstated rule of such education when the children saw their parents had no notion of inheritance at all, and were giving away what they had themselves inherited to their own and their children’s enemies in order to stop mere accusations from the same non-creating speech that they themselves had. Sexual relationships were and are used to substitute for marriage and then are broken off simply to gain the emotional experience of having done so as arming oneself in the notion of one’s own personal school of self-defense and longed for sympathy. Such efforts are to train oneself to recognize the common emotional intelligence from the truly remarkable and specialize in the remarkable as a means of manipulating sympathy for welfare. All of that went under the title ‘The Economy’. In that economy, Jobs were simply the means to play as both a ticket to the stadium and being picked to play on a team: the whole purpose of making money was to spend it for emotional practice. Those asking for jobs see such things as jobs as mysterious items magically created by strange wizards than off shoots of a way of life in the creating mindset of Jesus Christ. The sought for jobs are lifetime appointments on the team without the possibility of any interruption in emotional consumption rather than the expectation of new creation within themselves.

The lie of free will was the foundation of all the rest. No end of work was put in and is to this hour maintained to make the lie of free will seem real and as such a forgone conclusion as to not be worth investigating. Some in non-creating speech go so far as to say that if we do not have free will we shouldn’t know about it because of what it would do to us emotionally or even that we should knowingly lie and simply keep saying we do if we know we do not.

Free will was set up as a false opposite to what was called Determinism on the presumption that if one were true the other could not by definition be true. No end of arguments were and are to this day publicly aired as the standard paradigm for advertising products and taught at universities in such a way as to portray the fear that if free will for creatures as a concept is not true and has never been true, but instead the dreaded Determinism is true, then an emotional crash would ensue immediately both in the personal life of the one who understood such things and in the overall economy if lots of people understood such things.

Those taught that lie as a very particular evil knowledge that destroys them and all those they seek to help through those means were also handed other lies to make the first lies make sense when they were questioned. A spiritual uniformitarianism was taught to imply that the same spiritual environment exists as has existed all through history in order to make it appear that everyone in all of history has believed the same thing today’s youth are taught and specifically as supposed Christianity. “Lots of other people have already successfully believed what we are telling you” was the implication as the Old Religions were implied to have been rediscovered in publicly aired archeology events that supposedly validated the modern version of what the Old Religions were.

Christianity itself has not been usurped nor has the Word of God failed in these days or any day. But the term Christianity has been promulgated among the ignorant who do not know the difference between the Word of God and non-creating speech and has implied that indeed, Christianity itself has undergone changes that have resulted in the idealized old, pagan religions being correct while validating that non-creating, lying version of Christianity simultaneously for the specific purpose of drawing the attention away from the weaknesses of the lie of free will and instead supposedly being able to rejoice with the rejoicing of the fathers in ancient times who supposedly believed modern lies about reality. Then the false, dreaded Determinism is thrown in, despite that throw obviously invalidating the initial premise of free will being distinct from determinism to make it seem God Himself forced one into such a comfort as to be able to rejoice with the ancients in the exact same emotional experience. In false Christianity, the word God has become synonymous with the claims of non-creating determinism, while the word Jesus has become synonymous with the hope of getting out of what was determined so a free will could be enjoyed and the word Christ has simply been thrown in as a theological widget to be historically accurate among a Christians audience to more easily be a look-a-like gospel of the real Christ and Christianity.

The old economy was built on layers of lies that invalidated each other, but were delivered in such a way as to to imply the timing of each speaking and thinking of their supposed various aspects would prove them to have been working together as a harmonious whole all along and that poof would manifest itself in truth in the future. What it in fact it produced was devastation and ruin, because lies always have the effect of lies and the fruit of lies is always death. At each new attempt to ‘fix’ the mythical ailing economy, as attempts to spur those in the lie of free will ever onward with more speed and more enthusiasm, the same lies were relied on and even the same recipe of mixing together the lies was used on the newer audience who had come to expect such things as the only philosophical basis for a sound economy, being taught such from their youth.

Over the course of time, we have now inherited a lie as a national economy that is supposedly in need of repair, again, and which, in order to fix, every aspect of its former spiritual and philosophical aspects

must supposed remain sacrosanct, to include the notion that Jobs are a silver bullet to cure the ills of overproduction and over consumption; that the non-creating mindset of scarcity mixed with pride over having and experiencing the Unique Thing can produce a safe, stable environment for anyone and above all else, we are to supposed remain deceived that non-creating determinism is the only determinism, that free will and that non-creating determinism are supposed opposites and have supposed different results if one goes toward one or the other philosophically, and that the purpose and usefulness of Christianity is that it supposedly provides a hope of unrestrained free will to play in the old definitions of reality that were implied to have always been the beliefs of Man since Adam ( the old definition of money as a unit of freedom; freedom supposedly proved through trade via money, emotional intelligence being the sole product one must strive to obtain as the sole purpose of the Economy, etc..)

Lies are always complicated. The truth is always simple.

You have grown up in Satan’s version of The Economy over which was placed those who have a hard-core worship of the lie of human free will. Not one of them actually believes anything you have or will read here. In fact, they vehemently oppose it. Not one presidential candidate believes anything you will read here. They just want to fix the old economy, keep the old definitions and to worship scarcity as a guide to value minus any understanding of your value as an individual before God.

The new economy starts with your personal new creation in Jesus Christ. After that, you are your own proof that such a thing as a economy based on lack of new creation is anti-christ and death.

Mark 3:23-26  And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?  And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.  And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Hamas using white phosphorous. Big White Mama, where are you?

Remember the legal use of white phosphorus by the Israelis back on 2009 ‘Amnesty’ International twisted into a ‘war crime’ charge? In fact, white phosphorus is legal to use by actual countries as a military weapon for illumination and as incendiary devices against combatants. The use of such weapons against civilians is illegal.

Hamas is not a representative of any country and is a terrorist organization. They cannot even be said to represent a whole people; they have to put certain front persons, get money from terrorist regimes, act as if a democratic election had taken place and lie to even appear to be legit as what they wish and appear to represent a Cause. Now they are using white phosphorus rounds against Israel and employing non-local jihadist to do the work. You can’t even get a Palestinian these days to walk away form his prosperity long enough to  defend his own lie of wanting a ‘nation’; Iran and Syria has to send in some zombies who need to send some cash back home to the folks and who will do some dirty work for money. ‘And suddenly’, these foreign fighters have white phosphorous.

Haim Yalin, head of the Eshkol Regional Council, reacted sharply to the news of the phosphorus mortar attacks. Yalin said that he would send a letter on Thursday to the United Nations to alert it to the weapons being directed from Gaza against civilians.

“These weapons have been banned by the Geneva Convention. They cause burns among victims, and they kill. This is an agricultural area – and we are now having to explain to farmers how to deal with burns from phosphorus shells,” he said.


Where is ‘Amnesty’ International and Oxfam, those famous socialist arms of British Intelligence? Where are all the usual suspects clamoring for ‘justice’ over the breaking of  actual international law? While they said Hamas was guilty of war crimes last year, in a bid to look like a global authority on something that was ‘also’ being ‘fair’, there was no mention of Hamas using white phosphorous. They are quick to make up laws Israel is supposed to have broken that don’t actually exist. Yet when their friends and heroes of the communist and totalitarian cause, the Islamic terrorists break actual rules, there is complete quiet from those who can get a false accusation campaign against the US and Israel up and running in a minute. At the least, Israel used white phosphorus in the same legal way US forces in Iraq used it: against military targets. Hamas just sends it into a Jewish neighborhood via proxies like they send their regular, illegal rockets.

Is this what Jimmy Carter wants? Is this what the Presbyterian Church USA stands for? Did they divest from Israel Very Publicly to send spokeswomen to national tv chains in favor of the Philistines and invest in white phosphorus rounds for Hamas? How is this going to be told in the circles of self-righteous bigots in the PCUSA who praise Jesus one minute, Allah the next, Sophia the next, animism the next and have an inclusion dinner for homosexuals for Wednesday night, family supper while thanking God out loud for Barak Obama and his abortion policies?



Hush yo’ mouth, boy. Big White Mama likes her pride. In between episodes of supposedly winding up her own voodoo doll, she wouldn’t want Hamas to have to sing Nine Below Zero.


To remind you, what God has already Said, in addition to what He is saying now against all Christ haters::

Ezekeil 13:17-23  And thou, son of man, set thy face against the daughters of thy people, who prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy against them,   and say, Thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Woe unto the women that sew pillows for all wrists, and that make veils for the head of persons of every stature to catch souls! Will ye catch the souls of my people, and will ye save your own souls alive?   And will ye profane me among my people for handfuls of barley and for morsels of bread, to slay the souls that should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live, by your lying to my people that listen to lying?   Wherefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Behold, I am against your pillows, that the souls which ye catch by their means may fly away; and I will tear them from your arms, and will let the souls go, the souls that ye catch, that they may fly away.   And I will tear your veils and deliver my people out of your hand, and they shall be no more in your hand to be hunted; and ye shall know that I am Jehovah.   Because with falsehood ye have grieved the heart of the righteous, whom I have not made sad; and have strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way, to save his life:   therefore ye shall no more see vanity, nor divine divinations; and I will deliver my people out of your hand: and ye shall know that I am Jehovah.

In the Name of Jesus Christ,

The Definition of Lust; Effects of Lust

The Definition of Lust and its effects

The definition of lust and envy is not having faith in God’s character as creator or His Word.

The Ten Commandments are a sign post to believers in Christ, as new creatures in Jesus Christ, to never forget the creating character of God. You won’t ‘need’ to break the commandments because God is Creator. Lust and jealousy/envy is an ignorance of the creating character of God and a dependence on what already exists as a guide to what is good. Many new creatures in Jesus Christ can be a witness to their own new creation, and yet lust after the things of this world; particularly because they are tempted to lust because of the value Satan places on scarcity, his attempts to artificially induce scarcity to manipulate value, and the non-creating speech of Lucifer is the dominant speech they hear and see in action because it is in their non-regenerate neighbors as the life they live every day.

The Satanic definition of money itself is based on lust and jealousy and has nothing to do with Calvinism or capitalism. While money is not natural and must be manufactured, the amount of it in circulation at any one time grows and shrinks in exact accordance with a propaganda machine of Satan to make its relative scarcity uppermost in the minds of the people at all times.

Rather than see that God always creates enough, and on time and in such a way as make a reception of every one of His graces irresistible, Lucifer’s take on non-creation and scarcity is Lucifer’s god.

Habakkuk 1:14-17  And thou makest men as the fishes of the sea, as the creeping things, that have no ruler over them.  He taketh up all of them with the hook, he catcheth them in his net, and gathereth them into his drag; therefore he rejoiceth and is glad:  therefore he sacrificeth unto his net, and burneth incense unto his drag; for by them his portion is become fat, and his meat dainty.  Shall he therefore empty his net, and not spare to slay the nations continually?

That non-creation is the source of Lucifer’s power in the minds of men is without question. There could be no lust or jealousy without the deception that non-creation is a desired norm that grants stability to the environment in which to live. The way things truly are, is that there is always enough because God always creates enough in an environment in which we live and on time and makes sure the intended recipient of His grace actually receives that grace. Lucifer’s lie of ‘creation-as-catastrophe’ is only a lie and can never be the truth.

Yet the fear of not having enough and in particular not having enough of what we already see is good and beautiful is the normal life of the non-regenerate / pagans. In politics then, as Christians, we face a battle not of emotional intelligence of which resource needs to go to what group, but of a spirit in the non-regenerate (Eph 2:2  ‘the spirit that now works in the sons of disobedience’ )  that denies new creation and focuses instead on lust and jealousy as a normal political force that is both expected by the non-regenerate to be the norm but is relied on to manipulate. Once the deception of lust-as-expected-norm has taken hold, the only political solution to in-fighting over falsely idealized scarce resources is to get rid of a certain group: politics is then, in that deception, warfare.

The true political battle is then beliefs, not resources. In order to instill the maximum jealousy and lust, Lucifer needs the most groups competing for the fewest idealized scarce resources with absolute denial of new creation and an ignorance of new creation so complete as to be ignorant of even the denial of it while it is taking place. Thus he has a multi-X rhetoric combined with an idealized monopoly on the definition of money as a measure of freedom and expression of personal power: multi-cultural, multi-belief, multi-ethnicity, multi-cultural, multi-choice, multi-everything with a single means of expressing each one in such a manner such that those in each one cannot even recognize what it is they are envious of without a common valuation of it in economic or monetary terms.

Even if one or two groups can be shown that the idealization of resources as scarce is a lie and is inherently evil and sin against God with logic and yet no new creation for themselves in Jesus Christ, there are others that masquerade in what appears as protected religious behavior that do nothing but mock at new creation because they never perceive it and carry on with a the notion that politics is by definition an in-fighting over scarce things and cannot be anything else. Science and the popular perception of what science actually is in particular has been usurped for that exact purpose.

The guise then of ‘conservatism’ today is that it is only a slower, more cautious approach to the mandated in-fighting or that certain groups are unjust by the definition of never being satisfied and the number of groups must be cut by consolidating them into fewer groups or simply outright getting rid of them. Liberalism has always been an attempt to manufacture splinter groups as a means of getting rid of powerful groups and manipulate the idealized in-fighting by then doing a public theater of self-sacrifice and charity toward groups polished in the public mind to be less influential and thus having less of the idealized scare resource. Both groups are from the same source and both adherents worship Lucifer. Without the common deceptions that those resources are scarce, and that scarcity is the norm of life, there is no need for that conservatism or liberalism. Within that deception, ‘our values’ campaigns are common and worthless to counter lust and jealousy as politics even as they pretend to be ‘campaigns of hope’ to get out of the whole cycle. Even if they explicitly stated new creation as an ideal, it would be to them an unobtainable idea else they have no notion of politics with which to go forward.

Jeremiah 13:23 Can an Ethiopian change his skin, or a leopard his spots? Then may ye also do good, who are accustomed to do evil.

Understanding that lust and jealousy are not a realistic approach to life but is in fact sin because they are fundamental lies against God’s character and Word is a beginning to recovery of peace and prosperity. Yet within what masquerades for the pop Christian community, and particularly within the old denominations, the lie of human free will, because it relies on the same implied norm of non-creation and by extension non-‘interference from God as creation’ to ‘be true’ as popular politics, we see the source of the common lies that pervade all of society as that deception of what passes for merely being realistic.

Those who teach and preach that you have free will and your use of your free will is your path of salvation are simply liars that are force multipliers for Lucifer’s war against man. They know what they are doing; they are part of a conspiracy to kill as many as possible by subtle means expressly because they actually believe what they are saying. Even their charity is death. They actually think that Lucifer and Jesus Christ have the same speech and that one speech is the only speech in total reality. Their ‘hermeneutics’ and ‘rules of biblical interpretation’ prove what they believe about God as Word and as Creator and are identical to those who lie about the Constitution of the United States and who interpret laws to the incredulity and astonishment of the very public that is captive to the same beliefs and whom were told that if they would say those beliefs were true, peace and prosperity would rain from heaven.

There can be no peace among people deceived they have free will because in order to be deceived they have free will, they must deny God’s creating character and God’s use of Himself as Word, distinct from human speech and Lucifer’s speech to effect that creation. Once they have idealized scarcity as a desired norm in the guise of idealizing non-new creation as personal salvation in Jesus Christ, yet are deceived they can control a process of defining what is and what is not scarce, they have entered on the path to destruction and their teachers know this very well.

Yet the point of such public theater as Mormon Glenn Beck’s gathering in Washington and John Piper’s “Desiring God” conference with Rick Warren  is to pretend some great wisdom has been overlooked as forgotten history and together with Satan’s outlook on reality, they will all make peace and prosperity rain from heaven together in a way those who understand new creation in Jesus Christ and God supposedly cannot expressly because they have partnered with Lucifer.

Plainly, Beck and Piper ( despite one being a Mormon and the other being a supposed Calvinist ) do not believe in the creating power of God and see a need to partner with Lucifer’s followers in such a way as to exalt the wisdom of Lucifer’s followers and make it integral with and a necessary part of any political/realistic victories against an evil that is arbitrarily defined to be something other than Lucifer and an idealization of non-creation. They are lusting for what they see in front of them as both politics and the process of what they idealize as influence. No matter the differences they parse out between themselves over doctrine-on-paper, they all fundamentally are deceived they have a free will. Piper and others can call themselves Calvinists all day, even as Beck the Mormon calls himself a conservative; yet it is plan who and what they actually are: those deceived God can’t create such that they have to lust and copy what they have seen before as Lucifer’s methods to do public theater and call it evangelism and/or consciousness raising. None will be spoken through by God; all will talk about the reputation of what happens when God actually does speak and that will be idealized to leave the status quo the status quo as non-creation guised as stability.

Lust and envy are a fundamental denial of God’s character as Creator and as a distinct Word not the speech of Lucifer. Lust and envy cannot exist without an assumption that God’s speech and Lucifer’s speech are the same ..which is the unforgivable sin against the Holy Spirit.

Hebrews 10:26-31  For where we sin wilfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains any sacrifice for sins,  but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and heat of fire about to devour the adversaries.  Any one that has disregarded Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses:  of how much worse punishment, think ye, shall he be judged worthy who has trodden under foot the Son of God, and esteemed the blood of the covenant, whereby he has been sanctified, common, and has insulted the Spirit of grace?  For we know him that said, To me belongs vengeance; *I* will recompense, saith the Lord: and again, The Lord shall judge his people.  It is a fearful thing falling into the hands of the living God.

Those who say they are Christians at least imply they have actually heard God and then understand:

1Peter1:23-25  being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the living and abiding word of God.  Because all flesh is as grass, and all its glory as the flower of grass. The grass has withered and its flower has fallen;  but the word of the Lord abides for eternity. But this is the word which in the glad tidings is preached to you. overt, in your face new creation. We are the evidence of God’s creation in addition to His Word on the matter of history. How then could they lust for fame and a public splash “in order to” do the gospel exactly as those who say they have free will and the use of the will of man is a way to heaven?

What is the point of politics as usual as lust and envy and an appeal to politics as usual with its standard definition of money as a measure of free will and personal power in such conferences as John Piper’s if this is true:

John 1:12,13  but as many as received him, to them gave he the right to be children of God, to those that believe on his name;  who have been born, not of blood, nor of flesh’s will, nor of man’s will, but of God.


Such conferences and the political season in lust and envy are simply rides at Disney on ‘evangelical’ rides on rails: One goes up and down, another is the haunted house of other ideologies, another is the underwater ride in the same ideology ( they’ll see the old shipwrecks and demons in detail and learn nothing ) while another is simply a seat on which they sit and it spins. T-shirts, DVD’s, techy personal toys displayed, a light show, ‘praise’ songs, “a web version”, over-sized drinks, nice bathrooms and suckers.

You know: The re-popularizing of a defunct concept of generic, non-creating, ‘Determinism’.

Mat 11:15  He that has ears to hear, let him hear.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen