Archive

Archive for the ‘Governance’ Category

Bring no more vain oblations to the risen Word of God


Oh look. It’s Easter again.

Big voodoo in freewillerville. Their ‘easter’ bunny has supposedly laid multi-colored/ethnic/belief eggs for everyone to find. Somewhere over there a little Timmy has just found the prize egg and Mommy is so proud. She thinks their family finally “made it”. Churcheology, “conservative values/Reformed”, birth control, solid jobs they won’t have to give other ethnic groups or homosexuals “on principle”, a little bit of being “bad and therefore sexy” on the occasion, getting to do what she sees all the other women get away with on TV, …safety and privacy of thought and hope in lies and the politics of disease. Another year of having repeated treason against them by their elected officials who hold the exact same beliefs.

Yep. Another year of the false gospel they fall for every time while being warned about those dreaded Calvinist.

Another year of forgetting that God broke up non-creating speech at the site where that speech attempted to build a tower at Babel has gone by. Another year of thinking Jesus is a pussy who must forgive everyone who does evil because otherwise he just wouldn’t be Jesus ..according to that very speech that God broke up. Another year of saying “huh? WHAT “difference” in the two speaks? What does that even mean?!” has gone by. Another year of doing the unforgivable sin as default piety by basically equating the Word of God with the speech of Lucifer has gone by. All of the consequences of having done so are still here. Another year of freemasonry and Shriner witchcraft has gone by. Another year of sodomite victories over children because of the treason of elected and appointed officials has gone by.

But hey. It’s also another religious holiday. Sunrise service, etc. Easter dress. Easter suit. A new pope washing feet and doing emotion correctly in the eyes of those whose best honesty was taught to them by homosexuals, witches, child rapists and pornographers. Only after you’ve been through their schools can you remotely say the Pope is holy.

Woo hoo. Special candies they only sell this time of year in celebration of ..a pagan ritual this same time of year that looks exactly like an egg about to hatch to do its damage during the next year.

It’s the time of year when lying false prophets and priests stand up and “offer” the gospel to “whomsoever will” accompanied by portrayals of Christ on the Cross and few seconds at best of an empty tomb; a “gospel” that only be spoken in the speech God broke up at the attempt by that speech to build a tower at Babel. Another year of freewillers all trying to “understand” Calvinists and claim us as “fellow brothers in Christ” who just don’t do emotion correctly. Dang it. Another year of peace offerings to Calvinist having been rejected. Another year of pointing out the lies and deceit of arminians and free willers. Another year of the fruit of the lie of human free will destroying people.

So you can understand when the real Jesus Christ/Word of God said in His pre-Incarnate time:

Amos 8:10-14 And I will turn your feasts into mourning, and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins, and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning of an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day. Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD: And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORD, and shall not find it. In that day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst. They that swear by the sin of Samaria, and say, Thy god, O Dan, liveth; and, The manner of Beersheba liveth; even they shall fall, and never rise up again.

And:

Isaiah 1:12-15 Hear the word of the LORD, ye rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah. To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood.

You can also understand that if little Timmy found proof that Mommy, Daddy and Timmy were in a cult and thought he had found something Mommy and Daddy would surely congratulate him on because it had saved their lives and their souls, he would be shocked because Mommy would be actually be horrified and Daddy is already pussy whipped. In fact, little Timmy would be in Big Trouble with Mommy and Daddy. No more eggs for you, young man! No more Inclusion with us in religion.

Yet he would know that there was no famine and he had heard the Word of the Lord and been saved. Unlike Mommy and Daddy who dutifully said he was unsaved and did bad things “with his free will” because he saw the preacher was a liar. He knows already that in the speech God broke up at the attempt by that speech to build a Tower on the plains of Shinar there can’t be anything but a famine of the Word of God, no matter how many religious holidays they have in that evil speech that is anti-Christ.

—————————–

Sidebar: Perseverance of the Saints is not where you do what you want and God forgives you. It’s where God prevents you from doing what angers Him in the first place after He has forgiven your former sins and taken you outside the speech He broke up at the Tower of Babel to live in Jesus Christ. It’s always the lawless who say that Calvinism has “cheap grace” when in fact the “grace” the freewillers/lawless speak of as the gift only they can give to each other does not exist and so stops nor forgives any sin at all and their fruit plainly declares that.

If you can’t hear God, go hunt their eggs in your best clothes. Again.

Jeremiah_23:28 The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

The making of false Demographics to Divide those who should be Brethren..or not?


Let’s say you play the fiddle in Kentucky. Your grandfather did, his father did, etc. You play a certain way and have perhaps a distinctive family sound.

 

Someone in Florida or California or New York plays the fiddle. They play it ‘their way’. You may or may not have met them at Bluegrass festivals and such.

 

The thing you all have in common is that you believe ..you have free will; that your inspiration is a thing that is self-generated and peculiar to you and/or your family and that you ‘do it’ when you want to. You have what is called by free willers everywhere “a tradition”. If you play something different than “your tradition” people say you are wandering from your roots and at the least imply you are breaking a kind of code.

 

Enter those whose interest it is to manufacture false demographics for the specific purpose of turning you against your brethren in some other place or state. They take you up on your word that you have free will ..in fact, some of them came decades earlier dressed as pastors and priests specifically to lie to you that “God gave you free will.” So there you are now, in that lie, extremely proud, quite forgetting pride is sin. Now another set of witches comes in and says “Hey! Let’s build us a tower and celebrate the name we’ve made for ourselves with our distinctive style of music and living. We’ll won’t call it anther Tower of Babel, of course. We’ll call it a Cultural Center.”

 

Genesis 11:3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.

 

 

Genesis 11:4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

 

You said: “Go to let us build us a Cultural Center and there celebrate our regional peculiarity! Let us fill it with lies about history in order to make following generations think we were not blessed of God, but that we defeated our enemies and persevered by our own sweat and personal power! Let us make all the evil people look like heroes! Let us build our own brand name of the how we used the generic free will “all humans have by default”. Let us have occasions of drinking, gambling and taking of drugs and lewdness to defile our bodies with each other in order that we may celebrate the more how smart our free will is ..and then tell God we’re really sorry about that and get forgiven by the priests we have appointed ourselves from all classes of the people!

 

..and they had money someone else defined and for which they worked as slaves to buy materials from the other side of the world, ships and trucks to bring it all in and added a few bricks and iron implements that were locally handmade back in the 17 and 18oo’s along with a few finger paintings that looked like a retarded person had made them hanging from clothespins in the antechamber. “

 

Now, there you were, free to play your fiddle any way God played it through you and suddenly, if you ‘break tradition”, you denigrate the efforts to codify what your ancestors had supposedly done ‘in free will’ and are a heretic. You got yourself in trouble by falsely admitting you had free will ..at church, by celebrating the “free will” of the retarded people whose paintings you now have to say are “very artistic” in keeping with how artistically advanced your whole region is supposed to have already “evolved” into.

 

Not only so, but now you are automatically in a competition with other parts of the country that will in every way be turned into political adversaries based on the exact amount of sinful pride you will have in your “region” and they will have in theirs.

 

Any thing that God did through you that you could be talked into lying and saying you had done on your own was and will be used to set you against a neighbor who has no idea what you are talking about when you say you are in “competition” with them in some political, artistic or economic way.. The more peculiarity you can claim and have sinful pride over in the lie of free will, the more ammunition you give Lucifer to assault you.

 

Every time you speak in evil pride to celebrate yourself, you set yourself for certain destruction.

 

I saw a lie with your name on it: it was called ‘free will’. It was wrapped in a bow and sent to you ..at the same time God sent His Word. Which one will you hear: that you’ve got ‘free will’ or that you only live by the grace of God in every way of every detail of your life?

 

“Better dig two”. Nice song. I like it. Good lookin’ girl, good banjo licks, a little bang bang..the whole thing. One of the most righteous songs to hit the charts in years. Excepting that it plays on the lie of free will and God actually was the first to make it plain: “You’ll be mine forever or you’ll be in the lake of fire.”

 

 

1Kings 22:20-23 And the LORD said, Who shall persuade Ahab, that he may go up and fall at Ramothgilead? And one said on this manner, and another said on that manner. And there came forth a spirit, and stood before the LORD, and said, I will persuade him. And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said, Thou shalt persuade him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so. Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee.

 

 

Exodus 34:14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:

 

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

 

The Incarnation of the Word of God (aka “the birth of Jesus”) and the..definition of money?


Christ versus the lie of free will and versus the definition of money based on the lie of free will

What does the Incarnation of the Word of God have to do with the definition of money in the public mind?  Is it, as many have supposed and many so-called Christians claim to this day that “He could have done other things and made lots of money, given his talents but he chose instead to die for our sins”? To this day, many preachers claim to have talents that they could theoretically use to enrich themselves so that they may appear to be patri-sacrificers for others. The unstated theory is that money is a true blessing and that worldly riches are a legitimate right of man to possess as a blessing and as empowerment of a type of genius for manipulating one’s environment.

God knows better.

An empowerment device to supposedly prove “choice is being done” (money) cannot exist without the lie of free will and the lie of free will cannot exist without the appearance of a total lack of new creation as the norm and only possible state of all reality. Not only so, but the lie of free will itself is nothing more than a judgement paradigm applied after the fact in order to seem to ‘have had’ the experience of absolute freedom from God and so to look forward to a future experience of the same. Money is just a further device as a supposed physical representation to make the lie seem concrete as a bit of theater.

Jesus Christ is the Word of God. He was the pre-Incarnate Word of all eternity that became simultaneously the Son of God and the Incarnate Word of God. He is Creating Speech as the Word of God, the same Word that God Spoke and said “Let there be light and there was light.” etc. What He speaks comes into being because and only because He Spoke it into existence. Nothing exists that exists except that God made it and made it by Hos acts of Himself as Speech/Word/Christ/Jesus.

So the theory that Christ “could have been wealthy, but chose instead to be poor” is nothing more than giving the right hand to Satan when that poverty is confused with monetary and earthly wealth. Christ became Incarnate, among other reasons, to instigate and begin the new birth of us as brethren in Him as completely and totally free from the non-creating speech/anti-Christ He had Himself confounded at Babel. It is ALWAYS the non-creating speech as a rule with no exceptions that claims free will for men and those who “preach” as if sent from God for grace who pretend to have found free will in their Bibles only do so after they have implicitly claimed that all speech and the only possible speech in total reality is the speech God confounded at Babel and as if it had not been confounded.

An idealized lack of new creation produces a mindset of scarcity that is of absolute necessity in order to have a set of non-creating measurements that is then applied to those things idealized to be scarce in order to seem to have intelligently and “fairly” parsed them out to men. One is then said to ‘be rich’ among such deceived people by having a substantially larger portion that is necessary for life and safety or to ‘be poor’ when one has only what is falsely perceived to be absolutely necessary or lacks even that. ‘What is necessary’ is defined by lying measurements and the lie of free will is then used to divide brethren against themselves on the notion that each one has absolute freedom from God to do as they please and specifically to do as they please within in the defined parameters of the common scarcity. While in truth there is plenty, no matter how much one person or group has, the appearance of a large disparity of necessary stuff –in the midst of a perceived environment of a total lack of new creation–is most needed to set them against each other.

In the midst of such lies being the spirit of the times, no one turns to God in Jesus Christ to make new things as God does it through them; everyone instead fights over falsely perceived necessary things that are scarce and which in some fashion must be taken from each other.

The lie that Christ “could have been rich but chose to be poor” “because He loves the poor” in order to merely make those who have less stuff in the lie of free will and its lack of new creation as norm is just as evil as trying to say “God loves the rich more than the poor” because the rich do not suffer the worst derision to be had within the overall lie as do the poor and to make it appear as if God’s righteousness has anything at all to do with the emotional common sense to be found in the lie of free will and its scarcity.

Christ came to utterly annihilate the non-creating speech/anti-Christ and to save the elect from the wrath of God on that exact anti-Christ and all associated partners with it. Christ didn’t just ‘not use’ money or those subject to money or those subject in any way to the lie of free will and the merchants within it. He came to destroy them and their ‘economics’. He came to save the elect from all false measurement systems, to include those applied after the fact of every event they can recognize as having happened in order to make it seem they had successfully gotten away from God’s power and God’s love by the widget of saying they had free will in a speech that is not-God.

Christ’s definition of money is that He creates and you receive. That’s it. No scarcity; no you running after worldly money or its items; no confederacy with those that do; no you being subject to those that do and whose only speech is the speech God confounded at Babel.

Nowhere in the following Spirit and Life is there to be found the phrase “and they said “Let there be a tower and there was a tower”. Instead we see anti-Christ pretending anti-Christ didn’t exist and making the people build a tower to itself with their blood and sweat until God said “Stop working them like that..”

Liars who claim ‘I could be making lots of money but I’m foregoing that blessing to be a preacher to you and you ought to thank me for it’ are just slaves of a speech that can create nothing and without exception all claim you and they have free will.

Merry Christmas.

Genesis 11:1-9  And the whole earth had one language, and the same words.  And it came to pass as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and dwelt there.  And they said one to another, Come on, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and they had asphalt for mortar.  And they said, Come on, let us build ourselves a city and a tower, the top of which may reach to the heavens; and let us make ourselves a name, lest we be scattered over the face of the whole earth.  And Jehovah came down to see the city and the tower which the children of men built.  And Jehovah said, Behold, the people is one, and have all one language; and this have they begun to do. And now will they be hindered in nothing that they meditate doing.  Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.  And Jehovah scattered them thence over the face of the whole earth. And they left off building the city.   Therefore was its name called Babel; because Jehovah there confounded the language of the whole earth. And Jehovah scattered them thence over the face of the whole earth.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Polite tyrants are preferred by the deceived more than rude friends

December 21, 2012 1 comment

As a rule, when you are in a deception, you want to hear more of the common sense of the deception in friendly terms and anyone who tells you that you are deceived is deemed by you to be a fool. No matter if they say it politely or rudely, you can’t hear. So in keeping with part of your deception you give a certain amount of attention to the one telling you you are deceived and inside the deception that means you are a polite person and on your way to heaven.

But God knows you are full of lies and your deceptions only make you evil in God’s eyes.

Obama and company now want to start taking guns away on the premise less violence will ensue with less guns. The same evil act was perpetuated with a knife in China as was done with a gun in Connecticut.  Maybe Obama doesn’t know? Is that why no one is rushing for Knife Control in America? That staunch bed of liars at Huffington Post even reported on the Chinese version of Connecticut. Yet where is the outcry over Knife Control and why is there no mention of the whole Knife Control issue in the report? It’s a re-tweet of course: there is cctv footage, doomsday stuff, etc. Lots of info they re-used from someone else’s original reports but no statement of the elephant in the room: no gun was used. Same event: same outcome…unequal political responses.

Is someone being a liar for their own cause here? Do you know that and are afraid of them anyway because you don’t fear God?

How very polite you liars are. How easily upstaged you are by more and more evil brought about by your own ideology.

Now there is a cry to connect what is being called “mental health” with gun control. And who will say who is worthy of being declared mentally able to purchase and own a gun? Why an “expert panel” no doubt? Catholic bishops, those famous rapers of children’s asses now say we need more “mental health” oversight ‘too’. They will probably want to be on the panels so they can decide if you get to own a gun that will compete with the gun of the bad guy. The Catholics whose kids have no yet been raped by a priest will probably want the same thing.

Even the falsely idealized freedoms you had at the supposed permission of men and governments are being taken from you by those you know very well to be your enemies.

But you’d be ferocious if you really had free will wouldn’t you? Why the political action you’d perform would astound even an intellectual or dare I say it..a theologian among you. Did you think you were defending yourself? Or were you just listening to some really fast music?

Obama and all like him are just bad seed. You can’t save them.

Damn. That’s rude, ain’t it?

Gen 3:13  And Jehovah Elohim said to the woman, What is this thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent deceived me, and I ate.

or if you prefer:

Gen 3:13  耶和华  神对女人说:「你做的是什麽事呢?」女人说:「那蛇引诱我,我就吃了。」

..tha..same..thing..happened..no..matter..how..you ..slice ..it..

在耶稣基督的名,阿们。

(location, Noun, description marker, Noun, amen)

Obama the Murderer gives comfort? The lie of free will strikes again.


NBC, ever vigilant to use carnage as politics, is again claiming that Obama can be said to have comforted the victims of his own belief system: free will. The same belief system gave him a Nobel prize for simply existing. The same belief system is a cult of scarcity that causes Obama and all like him to use death as public policy in abortion and sodomy/AIDS. Now the murder of children in the womb claims to have empathy with parents who didn’t kill their kids in the womb, but were murdered by someone who was told all his life that he has free will and that it was other people’s fault that his could not get his latest desires. All he did was exactly what Obama and all those advocate for abortion do: kill those who even in theory will get in the way of possible future desires: those who get in the way of that utopian dream of where the lie of free will can go. There is no difference between Obama and the more obvious and open murderer of children in Connecticut. Yet NBC claims that a few words of ..something.. spoken in the general direction of those parents and family of that act of God in His use of Satan is comfort and consolation.

Where is that same consolation for the victims of birth control devices who have been ‘accidentally’ sterilized? Why no outcry for an end to birth control pills and devices over the deaths already proven to have been caused by those devices and medications. Why no ‘comfort speech’ thrown in their general direction by the murderer and son of a murderer Barak Obama and all those of his ideology? Why no comfort speech thrown at those homosexually raped by “Priests” of the lie of human free will called Roman Catholics and other free willers posing as Friends of Society and those who manufacture and give out  fake charity?

That’s easy: death is what they worship, but only death accomplished certain ways is possible to deceive human beings it would be in their benefit to worship death as a supposed friend of public policy. Unseemly death doesn’t do the population control crowd any favors in public although it accomplishes the same thing.

Where is the justice in painting gun owners as responsible for all unseemly death while abortionists and those who sterilize others by any means they can and given them diseases are supposedly heroes of the ‘planet’? Where is the justice in teaching people the same ideology that is causing the unseemly deaths to as many as possible in order to then misdirect their search for ‘what happened’? Where is the justice in pushing a false Christ that does nothing in the face of such unseemly deaths and indeed appears as ineffective as the lie it actually is while God as He actually is not feared and is actively and vigorously  denied.

The parents of the children murdered by the lie of free will yet again are yet another case of someone who wanted to be popular going along with popular lies about reality thinking that it would never touch them. Whenever they were told the truth, they laughed and said they would never teach their children what was unambiguously told them was the truth.

Instead, how cheaply the so-called justice is dispensed by those in the cult of the lie of free will: “Blame someone else’s free will who was not even at the scene but who has political expediency to be blamed and still keep the lie of free will alive one more day.”

God decreed the act in Connecticut and yet is righteous and holy. What does that truth make those who seek alternative explanations in order to make their false versions of God attractive to an idealized free will of man? God as He actually is cannot be chosen and so He never acts as if what He does might thwart your salvation by turning your present emotional common sense against Him or His true servants. Those who ride in to speak lies on their own false god’s behalf and call that justice and comfort are just murderers and liars who have in mind to keep a lie alive that they know very well is killing millions every month.

The parents of those children, like all parents these days, were told to use birth control for ..some reason or another. How many did and now those kids were all the kids they had?

The murder and son of a murderer Barak Obama says he ‘feels’ for those in agony over their death of their children? Not only does he not agonize over it, he plants the seeds for more of it. They have been doing it for hundreds of years and laughing about it. All free willers ever do, bound to their lie as they are, is try to appear to take free will from some unrelated group of persons when some tragedy strikes in order to have the appearance of having used their ‘free will’. It doesn’t matter how nonsensical it is or who gets hurt as they look good in their own eyes for having worshiped their lie.

No matter what else you were told, you do not have free will, killing to protect the so-called free will is murder, Jesus Christ is not a pussy and you never did fuck Him, if you cannot hear God you will burn in hell and THEN be cast into the lake of fir and God’s putting you in a false religion and keeping you there is His way of saying Fuck You. All your sadness and all your fake sympathy is worthless. You never did love anyone enough to tell them the truth.

The only chance you have of escaping a similar fate and everyone standing around doing the same worthless crap over your memory for the sake of their false religion is the grace of Jesus Christ overlooking all your evil that love to this day.

Pro 19:2 Also that a person be without knowledge is not good; and he that hasteth with his feet maketh false steps.

Pro 19:3 The folly of man distorteth his way, and his heart is irritated against Jehovah.

For I am certain that neither death nor free willers, Jesuits, arminians, Billy Graham, false priests, devious liars, politicians, Hollywood, good damned sodomites, Mormons, Scientologists, Islamics, fake Jews, or the Republicans or Democrats or even the god damned unionists, or the god damed journalists, hosts, co-hosts and screen readers or british-accented mother fuckers screeching at the top of their voices can separate us from the love, the discipline, the hard core, in your face salvation in new creation in Jesus Christ.

God sent that pain. You better think again if you think it was someone else. You keep saying you have the free will to do exactly that. How ferocious you’d be if you actually free will, huh? What pay-back you’d give God, is that it? How can you do that and keep dragging the bodies off the highway of the lie of free will. “Please remove damaged hearts off the freeway so every one else’s dreams can proceed with caution.”

 

See how that works? No matter what emotional paint brush God uses to speak the gospel, you’ve still been planted. Bitter pill sweet pill. What difference does it make? It’s not a poisoned pill.

Romans 8:31-39 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who against us? He who, yea, has not spared his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not also with him grant us all things? Who shall bring an accusation against God’s elect? It is God who justifies: who is he that condemns? It is Christ who has died, but rather has been also raised up; who is also at the right hand of God; who also intercedes for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? tribulation or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? According as it is written, For thy sake we are put to death all the day long; we have been reckoned as sheep for slaughter. But in all these things we more than conquer through him that has loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, amen

The lie of free will versus inheritance in the mouth of the deceived


Obama, the murderer and son of a murderer, has made news again with his comments that if you are successful, you didn’t gain your own success, someone else did. And you owe political favors to an anonymous someone because you got an inheritance, they got the same inheritance and have squandered theirs. I suppose he’ll be giving back his nobel prize and publicly proclaiming he is incapable of any success as a supposed virtue. His policies have been an utter failure.

That is just one more instance of a free willer, who says that you have free will and by the default of existing as a human being ‘with free will’ must be the creator of your own success or failure and ‘take responsibility’ lying against his own lie of free will. Indeed, the constant slander against all his opponents is that they are undereducated as to his ‘message’, that being their fault as well according to his lie of free will and are constantly not using the free will they supposedly have correctly. Now he is saying no one –by definition– can use their free will correctly to do success properly because they cannot by definition construct their own success in the presence of others who have gone before.

What Obama has said as a lie is what happens when a socialist tries to explain inheritance, a thing socialists loath almost as much as they hate Christ. Inheritance is well understood to be outside of even the idealized free will of those who receive it and socialist need everyone completely inside the lie of free will to control them. Inheritance  is the result of ‘something that happened before you were born’. Or in the vernacular of political animals, ‘something that happened before I took office’. But instead of seeing prosperity as an inheritance as a blessing, Obama and those who support him see inheritance as a source of blame. You supposedly owe someone who lived in the past but you must pay someone else who had nothing to do with that prosperity simply because you got it. It’s your fault that inheritance was dropped on your head by God.

Those who built roads and infrastructure of former generations are neither praiseworthy or blameworthy for our own prosperity. God did through them what He did through them and they were and will be paid by Him. God has given us the inheritance in Jesus Christ and now those who hate Christ seek to to twist inheritance in their politics of guilt.

In the politics of guilt, you always have to explain yourself and excuse yourself simply because you exist and are not of those doing the accusing. Now the accuser of our brethren seeks to appeal to determinism/inheritance as a blameworthy thing in order to then order you to use your idealized free will in whatever manner they wish in a supposed necessary forgiveness paradigm.

Wow. Just like false religion.

You wanted to play with the lie of free will. You wanted to say you had at least ‘a little bit’. Every little bit you supposedly have will be the exact amount of guilt you will feel with every accusation no matter how outrageous or hypocritical to the liars own ideology they have to be to consume your time and lives with accusations.

Col 1:9-17  For this cause we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding;   That ye might walk worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God;   Strengthened with all might, according to his glorious power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness;  Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:  Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.  Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:   And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

The Lie of Free Will versus New Creation in Jesus Christ: Case study : Economics Part One


Free Will and False Morality

New creation destroys the foundations of any morality produced by an idealized free will by the means of introducing new elements or changed elements on which the free will based morality depended. These new introductions of elements or changed elements as growth phases act as both replacements and as simple growth of the whole environment, pushing aside the placement of both physical and spiritual entities upon which were founded former concepts and spirits that were organized under the titles morality or ethics. The movement in the mind of the individuals, the changing of the individuals into new spiritual creatures and the changing of the overall environment in which non-new creatures in Jesus Christ and new creatures in Jesus Christ live, and on which a well organized, stable morality depended, acts to destroy the organization of that morality and thus the hope placed in it to be proof offered to God of goodness. The morality itself dissolves as its constituent elements / spirits are changed or even moved slightly.

It is not simply a matter of a change in basic principles and thus a swapping of ideology by the same creature in the same, unchanged environment such as changing religions or ethical patterns. Such a thing is never the case as new creation is on-going by God at all times. But the pretense of such self-change or idealized collective-of-autonomous-selves as societal change is a common theme of moralities that depend on free will and are only differing formulas for idealized choice among a group of elements idealized to be eternally static or changing so slowly that the change will in no way effect the idealized present choosier because of mortality. The morality as an end product of a lifetime of supposed choice is then idealized to be eternally beneficial expressly because the spiritual elements of total reality are idealized as not merely unchanging during the lifetime of the individual, but eternally unchanging; new creation is not only constantly denied by such a scheme, but is decried as the enemy.

Righteous morality before God is non-changing because those who have received grace only depend on the unchanging character of God Himself, the blood of Christ and the Word and Power of God. The free will based models of morality seek to mimic God’s never changing judgment that He performs in the midst of His new creation as if what God does is a principle of static power and environment by implying a free will that is never bound by anything and yet static elements that are as unchanging as God from which to build behavior that impresses God that one is supposedly righteous without the need for grace of God and without new creation in Jesus Christ. By the definition of free will morality, if God or any other thing out of which morality is built changes, the morality itself is overthrown; it morphs into something else when either the environment out of which it is built changes or the thing to which it is applied changes.

Thus some of the purposes of the lie of free will are seen: to deny a change in the creature ( oneself ) as being non-metaphorically born again in Jesus Christ, so that the idealized stable and eternally unchanging creature with its own versions of morality may seem eternal and thus relevant and to deny changes in the environment out of which the free will morality was formerly built. The lie of human free will must deny anything else can exist but the exact conditions that supposedly make it a fact that men have free will. The consequences of that denial are catastrophic to a successful life of the individual and society even in the present as they multiply hypocrisy and self-deceit.

By denying new creation on all levels, simply to protect the ideology of free will, reality is denied simply to have a false face of stability in which present belief systems that rely on a concept of free will can survive. That false stability is made to seem to produce morality to seem that the whole is an honest paradigm of being righteous. The individual deceived free will exists for men keeps saying “I have free will. I have free will.” while their actual environment closes in on them and they have not received the grace of God’s presence in them.

Over time, those institutionalized in the lie of free will grow afraid of new creation even as a concept and see it as their enemy. They are forced to deny its very existence as an ideological argument in order to carry forward an agenda of making everyone believe free will actually exists for creatures; the other definitions of parts of reality rarely mentioned that must be defined a very particular way in order for human free will to make sense are zealously guarded by adherents of free will based religions and philosophies and new creation destroys them.

Free will theology is not simply a religious phenomenon or a thing which only has religious implications. It applies to politics and society in every area as a stunting of creativity and as a xenophobia of creation, while claiming to be the sole path to personal salvation before God and economic prosperity. Yet it has as a ridiculous slogan “the entrepreneurs will save us” as if depending on the very change that destroys their carefully built morality in order to build future economic prosperity. As long as that change has new definitions in place that seem to mandate free will, all is well to maintain the illusion. But if not, the change is decried as heresy.

Calvinism is proved to be the honest truth of Jesus Christ that can be tested and found to be true over and over, even in the midst of new creation and ever changing environments, be they ideological or physical.

To change the definition of money necessarily changes the morality surrounding money, which bumps the table on which free will morality is busy faking righteousness and thus effects one’s eternal place of abode in those models .. but has no effect on Calvinism.

The present popular definition of money and trade is based on scarcity; not new creation of plenty. The idealized environment in which to keep the present definition of money in the public mind valuable is then static and one of artificially maintained scarcity for a supposed public good. The notion of fairness within the definition of money is also based on ‘spreading around’ what is idealized to be scarce and the whole farce of equality within those paradigms is destroyed by the simplicity of new creation in Jesus Christ: when every has Christ who is the source of life and new creation, no one has a need to maintain an assumption of a scarce product one must run out and buy before it runs out as a political paradigm and merchants who rely on a civil-rights/choice based marketing scheme are undone. The whole evil show is based on non-creation and a near worship of lack of new creation in order to maintain a free market model of ‘scarcity dictates price” in order to keep prices up and business pumping.

To change models of government equally destroys the former security of free will based morality ..and doesn’t touch Calvinism

Advances in technology destroy free will based notions of morality and safety of soul based on that morality ( and that is why you never see such advances as products of nations in which free will based religions reign: they all want to think their own models of morality are eternal and don’t want any change ) ..and never touches Calvinism.

Why is Calvinism unchanged and unafraid of change no matter the amount of new creation or paradigm shifts? Being new creature in Jesus Christ and the common sense of on-going new creation is the truth of Calvinism; not merely theorizing about it or hoping for it. Embracing in whatever manner is necessary what is actually new creation as reality is then the Christian lifestyle and indeed, expectation. In contrast, as previously shown trying vainly to hold on to idealized self-built morality by supposed free willed protectionism in favor of the ideological items out of which that morality was supposedly built is the standard lifestyle of all who are deceived they have even partial free will.

Those who are deceived they have even partial free will cling to the past and call it Tradition; are afraid of new things and end up destroying their own lands and each other in a fight that must take place because of the falsely idealized scarcity of basic needs. In the midst of a world financial crisis, which those who are hard core believers in free will have manufactured through their ideology and consequent actions, new creation and acknowledgment of God’s on-going new creation is needed, not simply a rearrangement of what already exists ( usually termed “a fair deal for everybody” ) while an on-going denial of new creation and in denial of God in Jesus Christ is maintained. Both a quick look and in-depth research demonstrates that hard core free willers who call themselves pro-Christ but love the lie of human free will and loath Calvinism have been the destroyers and usurpers of all that God has formerly created other than new creatures in Jesus Christ / body of Christ and are solely responsible for the present destruction and international tensions according to their own definitions of reality. If one actually counts the Calvinists among them, one quickly finds there are none. At best one finds a constant hatred of Calvinism and a lie of that it is supposedly Calvinism’s fault that monopoly capitalism is unrestrained. One even finds the outrageous lie that Calvinism is the philosophical and spiritual foundation for monopoly capitalism when in fact monopoly capitalism itself is totally dependent on and is defined as artificially maintained scarcity. Monopoly capitalism could only arise out of a hatred of Calvinism, the lie of human free will and the consequent reliance on denial of new creation in addition to a false definition of stability that provides such practices upon which monopoly capitalism relies to exist at all under any guise.

A real world example: A group of people with a notion of false moral stability which is based on an idealized absolute lack of new creation will be terrified if anyone mentions changing the definition of money, even as they must deny that the definition can be changed at all. It is a rule that those who profess that free will exists for creatures always have an area within their ideology that they assume others will think is ruled by determinism. Such things as the definition of money, grace, public policy and the like are the sacrosanct definitions that are presumed to be untouchable and on a level with natural phenomenon over which no free willed creature is expected to have power over. A very clear demarcation exists within free will ideology itself between ‘what a free willed entity can do’ ..within the bounds of an unspoken and very nebulously defined determinism that is implied to be synonymous with God’s predestination and election. What is changed when the definition of money is changed is an idea in the mind of a vast population and the fear based on that idea.

Questions those deceived free will exists must ask, in their most honest moments include: Who will be moral in the new paradigm of the new money? How will that new morality be recognized? How will it effect choice?

If they are religious they will also ask: How will it effect being righteous in God’s eyes? Where are the rules to live by in the new paradigm so that the individual will know with certainty that one is a friend of God?

All such questions are a consequence of being in a lie yet living in reality, which is the fundamental condition of fallen men. Being busied with such concerns seems to them to be both common sense and piety. Yet to even dare to breathe such questions by them is an admission of a deeper outlook they have that makes morality unreliable and that they actually have a reliance on a vague notion of grace that must be applied no matter how changes come about or what those changes actually are. But the grace they rely on as an adjunct to free will is to them, by definition, something that cannot interfere with the idealized free will and thus cannot be new creation of the creature that has the idealized free will and cannot jiggle the table on which is built their entire house of moral cards.

In Christ, as new creature, one sees one’s own new birth as favor from God and thus a trust in God is immediate. New creation is then seen as both a friend and, as part of the nature of God, a standard part of reality. The grace of God in Christ is well understood to be part of new creation and there is no reliance on a static, non-growing, non-creating environment in which to assure oneself by one’s own moral code as one’s own witness that one is a friend of God. The very elements on which such a self-witness must rely are constantly changing and growing. God then is the only reliable witness and those through whom He witnesses.

Romans 8:16 The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit, that we are children of God.

What we see is that any notion of free will, no matter how small or large, whether it is called libertarian free will or partial free will, manufactures a fear of reality as xenophobia and a total lack of creativity in addition to a loathing of creativity in others. Everything must remain as it is idealized to exist for the sole benefit of keeping intact a particular ideology in order for those old in any particular version of morality to idealize themselves as keeping the morality they have earned by self-will and constructed out of unchanging, immovable elements. If anything changes about themselves as creatures or about their physical and spiritual environment as ideology, the morality they have supposedly so carefully crafted for themselves dissolves in front of them and as such, their salvation of soul.

The mixture of a few admissions that new creation may exist, but viewed as merely a shift or mere combination of in some part of reality that already existed added to an idealized static morality only produces hopelessness and fatalism. Such people end up as zealots of the slogan ‘live for today’, denying even more of reality in the guise of embracing honest change. They are enabled to be honest enough to face the truth that changes occur, but in seeking to hold onto a paradigm of self-constructed salvation of soul via a free will, are overthrown in the face of that change. At best, they must start over in a new free-will based religion working to earn ‘another’ salvation in ‘another’ morality.

The scenario described here is being played out right now. It could only work if the general populace are deceived they have free will. Arminian theology / Roman Catholicism / Mormonism/Islam and the like exist to produce the exact kind of person required to fall for the traps described below. If you are one of those people pushing free will as a debt trap in a liberal then conservative cycle, you would necessarily want a religious outlook that includes everyone to ensnare the most. Your version of unity, human love and brotherhood would then be nothing more than a bald statement that you want every kind of human being ensnared in your trap and all thinking alike with no exclusions. You want them all deceived exactly the same way to the same extent and the only way to do that is make them think they are being righteous and saving their souls to think the thoughts that keep them in debt.

In addition, someone has you doing the unforgivable sin as default religious behavior ( equating the Word of God with non-creating speech/Satan’s speech ) based on a false purpose of eyesight argument that basically says if you see anything, no spiritual activity is going on. That means when you read the Holy Scriptures they are not holy to you and must be will-neutral to all human beings by the mere fact you saw text at all or at best you equate your experince of reading them to others who say they read a holy text of a different religion.

Propaganda like the 60 Minutes piece on seizures plays directly to that deception. A man in one scene says “Even into the 20th century some people thought seizures were evidence of demonic activity” and then later on in another scene a doctor is showing a scan of a ‘seizure in progress’. Lights dance in a certain portion of the screen and the reporter leans forward and points to the lights and says “Right here? This is the seizure?” as if the mere fact she is seeing anything ( and you are seeing anything over her shoulder) and what you/she are seeing is being described as electrical activity in the brain, that is supposedly proof no spiritual phenomenon can be going on in front of you. Basically, it is propaganda to instill an automatic reaction that if you see something, by the definition of sight, it wasn’t spiritual. That way, a ‘scientific’ explanation can be put over the whole, which itself relies on non-changing physical laws that rely on lack of new creation. Put that in the arena of reading and no text you ever read is supposed to be doing anything spiritual to you just because you saw it. ..which is the classic arminian/free will take on interpreting the Scriptures: because they can read it and look at text, by definition to them means it has no spiritual power whatsoever and thus they are able to do what they call interpretation ‘on’ the text.

God’s take on seizures: Mat 17:15-21 Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is lunatic, and suffers sorely; for often he falls into the fire and often into the water. And I brought him to thy disciples, and they were not able to heal him. And Jesus answering said, O unbelieving and perverted generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I bear with you? Bring him here to me.  And Jesus rebuked him, and the demon went out from him, and the boy was healed from that hour. Then the disciples, coming to Jesus apart, said to him , Why were not *we* able to cast him out? And he says to them, Because of your unbelief; for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed , ye shall say to this mountain, Be transported hence there, and it shall transport itself; and nothing shall be impossible to you. But this kind does not go out but by prayer and fasting.

The Apostle Paul was said in non-canonical books to have had epilepsy as the “thorn in my flesh because of the greatness of the revelation given to me.”

A people soaked in that kind of lie and propaganda as a false purpose of eyesight argument just to keep forcing them to say they have free will are easy prey for the following scenario:

The current false definition of money as a measure of freedom

summary: the lie of human free will and its connection with totalitarianism: free will is pushed as an inescapable public paradigm in the midst of a manufactured cycle of Big Spending Government and then Fiscally Conservative Government specifically to bring about a public illusion of morally obligated debt whether or not one participated in that spending; that feeling of obligation is directly linked to a perception of free will and money as a measure, representation and controller of that free will as being the sole expression of free will within the political arena per the propaganda. The Conservative portion of the show is implied to be both the foundation of reality and goodness and the iron bars of moral obligation while the liberal/spendthrift portion is the supposed experience of freedom that you pay for later in a more moral and stable environment; ..planned, temporary destabilization periods followed by reaping the benefits of the sown obligation to induce slavery as the norm and the expected norm as public, defacto religion

—————————-

The current definition of money in the public mind as a product of propaganda that is maintained 24/7 365 by all means possible is one of a measure of human free will as a power grab by those who keep up the pretense of human free will. They are deceived people really have free will, there is no Creating Word of God at all, much less as distinct from non-creating speech and thus everyone is in a fight over limited resources: what already exists. A way to ensure your own enrichment in that atmosphere and within that mindset/spirit is to continually aggravate another person’s attention span that they have freedom that they are not taking advantage of and if they do not use it they will lose it. All current advertising fits easily within that paradigm. You cannot maintain such spending-for-freedom or spending -as-freedom over a long period of time and maintain the flipside of money as a measure of something scarce: that anything is scarce. The scarcity is the only thing that makes that definition of money valuable on a long term basis in a free will paradigm.

Money is plainly seen as a representation of freedom/free will and the speed with which to express that idealized freedom. The lie of free will is preached from every pulpit that despises Christ, every advertisement, and from the large majority of persons in the public to each other. Indeed, to say otherwise than men have free will brings almost certain derision. In short, the population as a whole is attacked with the lie that they have free will at all and the further lie that they are not using ‘enough’ of it, that attack is perpetuated over decades and centuries, which induces feelings of a storehouse of freedom that one cannot express ( because the illusion is that the freedom is real and would ‘work’ somewhere other than in the circumstances one is actually in..) and that lacking that expression of freedom one is both falling behind others who are falsely represented to them as heroes of the use of the idealized free will ( false history ). In addition it is falsely assumed in that lie that one has a valuable part of oneself that is not and cannot be used without an empowering mechanism. Money is the favored mechanism that is represented to them to be a tool the free will uses to express itself: it cannot be used alone but is meant to be used in public and thus becomes an automatic proof and evidence from one free willer to another that they have personal power and as such are ‘legitimate’ human beings. Above all else, free will is represented to be the default state of human beings, whether one liar says God forced it on us or another says evolution forced it on us. Money then becomes the mechanism of both proving to others that one is in the same default state of others and is therefore ‘really’ human and ‘belongs’, but also as a defense mechanism whose power grows with the amount spent.

The phenomenon of women loving to shop for things they don’t actually need but are merely trendy is easily seen as an enslavement to the need to supposedly express free will in the most benign way available to them. No one has to be confronted per se; items bought are a passive proof of personal power over objects. What is important is that the idealized freedom that is pretended to exist at all times is expressed even if on a kind of automatic behavior cycle that is piggy-backed on buying of items of necessity. The lie of free will in every way is loved by all merchants; is the fundamental paradigm of all advertising; is the reason merchants support very particular religious organizations.

Credit is not the equivalent of grace

Th notion of credit is then an easy enslaving device to those whose best honesty is that they have free will: one gets to supposedly prove the free will and the defense mechanisms of purchasing are kept intact; one stays ‘included’ in a world-system and thus supposedly proves worthiness to be considered human in public, while the money is imputed for a time as if it were the equivalent of grace and thus had as friendly a face as the god of the false grace free will preachers preach.

Times of big spending are then pushed as a public/governmental paradigm and when those deceived into debt on the premise they were exercising a freedom-on-a-timer have sufficiently fallen in the trap to keep them subdued until a large debt is repaid in the future, then a more conservative paradigm is pushed wherein the exact morality upon which the notion of free will depends dictates they remain in debt and do whatever behavior is required to pay it off even if they were not a beneficiary of what was spent. The liberal/wild spending spree followed by a more conservative outlook on that same implied freedom is a means of control that enslaves those deceived they have free will even if they are the party who profits monetarily and with, in essence, free labor from the cycle. The supposed persons in charge and who loan the money are afraid of those now in debt based on an understanding of reality that is entirely inside the definitions of reality that force the existence of free will as common sense; they are just as enslaved as the others.

The political cycle of Democrat/liberal/spendthrift followed by Republican/conservative is for the most part, a single group of people manufacturing such cycles and seeks to ensnare by government fiat the whole population regardless of whether or not one is a spendthrift or deceived by the lie of free will simply by participation in trade with money at all and being a citizen.

The massive bailouts of huge corporations that mismanaged their assets proves that an implied fiscal genius has nothing to do with who will be rich or poor but only those who pull the strings of a machine founded on the lie of human free will and who perceive their personal safety and safety of soul to stand or fall on concepts of free will. Business to such persons is merely a front wherein they define what is legitimate like franchises with no regard for morality or Christ while seeking to portray that Business is Christian by definition ..of human free will. It also served as propaganda to instill in the minds of the populace a paradigm of who-has-the-money are the Rich and whoever owes the money are the Poor as a moral paradigm regardless of actual morality. Drug lords and pimps can be legitimately rich in such a mindset and maintain their grip over populations and force children into their respective slavery with impunity. What is called justice and concepts of fair play is all based on the false scarcity that is necessary to maintain the notion of lack of new creation and thus the possibility of human free will.

Everyone knows that the massive portion of the funds loaned by the government went to those already wealthy and for the most part banks. That was no secret because it was never intended to be a secret. It was intended to be known in order to imply a seat of power wherever the money ( and by implication, the free will ) ended up and to make that power known as defacto god that forced all citizens into debt and who are now supposedly morally obligated to pay back those funds under a coming more fiscally conservative but in truth anti-Christian government with idealized higher moral standards founded on an idealized human free will, even though they never received any value for the money they supposedly borrowed or profited in any way whatsoever. According to false preachers and false prophets God or evolution forced free will on everyone, and suddenly an invisible wave went through the population and all the free will ended up in a Very Big, Heavily Guarded Vault that belongs to a select few. Literally, if it lives in the US, per the paradigm, it owes and specifically owes those who engineered the whole propaganda. Even to be the one who is owed they need the lie of human free will, in order to appear to be independent agents. It doesn’t do an aspiring slave master any good for the target population to know with certainty that they all only owe God in Jesus Christ and that there is no free will.

Those same persons have in past times maintained the concept/lie that free will exists and that it can be traded from individual to individual. Such phrases as “pool our sovereignty” ( in quotes gives 11,500 hits on Google ) and the like imply free will exists and can be given away, taken or traded as a commodity. Indeed, many have attempted to define victory in war as the taking away of a certain threshold amount of free will from the enemy, at which point the enemy is said to collapse. Money in such definition and debt schemes is then idealized as part of the propaganda to be the very device that takes free will from one and gives it to another thus being in the eyes of the deceived a measure of their own free will as well as yardsticks in supposed economic warfare.

If they owe money, they supposedly owe free will. That such phrases are spoken in other areas than debt is simply a bid to legitimize them by appealing to a supposed universality of their application; everywhere free will can theoretically exists ‘there the proofs of humanity are’ is simply an implied shorthand for ‘everywhere you are, since you have free will, you are in debt’. So-called pooling free will for good purposes as activism and charity are the favored legitimizing topics. Even then they are hypocritical as the causes they champion are anti-Christ. But having supposedly washed them morally by presenting them as the strength behind the will to give and be a charity, their definition of money then acts like a glue going through the target population and taking all the idealized free will from everyone who handles money at all. Even when you know you didn’t receive any bailout money and don’t have free will they must imply you are still a slave to keep their paradigm in place to control others.

The Democrats are there to get you into implied debt with credit; the Republicans are there to make you feel morally obligated and to make you feel that saying you are in debt is the ‘right thing to do’. Right now they are running a ‘values’ campaign while the implied debt piles up. The ‘values’ are never stated outright but generalized to be ‘fiscal responsibility’ coupled with a vague implication of ‘honesty’. The ‘values’ turn out to be responsibility for the actions of others in the guise of being the ideal citizen: taxation without representation and monstrous social policies mandated because we supposedly ‘pooled our free will’ in a credit cycle and now must obey the Ones Who Are Owed.

The lie of human free will is the road to self-induced totalitarianism by that very means. It slowly becomes the best honesty of the people who then are deceived that economic enslavement goes hand in hand with the salvation of their soul.

Jeremiah 9:4-8  Take ye heed every one of his neighbour, and trust ye not in any brother: for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbour will walk with slanders.  And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, and weary themselves to commit iniquity.  Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the LORD.  Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, Behold, I will melt them, and try them; for how shall I do for the daughter of my people?  Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; it speaketh deceit: one speaketh peaceably to his neighbour with his mouth, but in heart he layeth his wait.

Colossians 2:6-10  As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:  Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.   Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.   For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.   And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen