The Lie of Free Will versus New Creation in Jesus Christ: Case study : Economics Part One

Free Will and False Morality

New creation destroys the foundations of any morality produced by an idealized free will by the means of introducing new elements or changed elements on which the free will based morality depended. These new introductions of elements or changed elements as growth phases act as both replacements and as simple growth of the whole environment, pushing aside the placement of both physical and spiritual entities upon which were founded former concepts and spirits that were organized under the titles morality or ethics. The movement in the mind of the individuals, the changing of the individuals into new spiritual creatures and the changing of the overall environment in which non-new creatures in Jesus Christ and new creatures in Jesus Christ live, and on which a well organized, stable morality depended, acts to destroy the organization of that morality and thus the hope placed in it to be proof offered to God of goodness. The morality itself dissolves as its constituent elements / spirits are changed or even moved slightly.

It is not simply a matter of a change in basic principles and thus a swapping of ideology by the same creature in the same, unchanged environment such as changing religions or ethical patterns. Such a thing is never the case as new creation is on-going by God at all times. But the pretense of such self-change or idealized collective-of-autonomous-selves as societal change is a common theme of moralities that depend on free will and are only differing formulas for idealized choice among a group of elements idealized to be eternally static or changing so slowly that the change will in no way effect the idealized present choosier because of mortality. The morality as an end product of a lifetime of supposed choice is then idealized to be eternally beneficial expressly because the spiritual elements of total reality are idealized as not merely unchanging during the lifetime of the individual, but eternally unchanging; new creation is not only constantly denied by such a scheme, but is decried as the enemy.

Righteous morality before God is non-changing because those who have received grace only depend on the unchanging character of God Himself, the blood of Christ and the Word and Power of God. The free will based models of morality seek to mimic God’s never changing judgment that He performs in the midst of His new creation as if what God does is a principle of static power and environment by implying a free will that is never bound by anything and yet static elements that are as unchanging as God from which to build behavior that impresses God that one is supposedly righteous without the need for grace of God and without new creation in Jesus Christ. By the definition of free will morality, if God or any other thing out of which morality is built changes, the morality itself is overthrown; it morphs into something else when either the environment out of which it is built changes or the thing to which it is applied changes.

Thus some of the purposes of the lie of free will are seen: to deny a change in the creature ( oneself ) as being non-metaphorically born again in Jesus Christ, so that the idealized stable and eternally unchanging creature with its own versions of morality may seem eternal and thus relevant and to deny changes in the environment out of which the free will morality was formerly built. The lie of human free will must deny anything else can exist but the exact conditions that supposedly make it a fact that men have free will. The consequences of that denial are catastrophic to a successful life of the individual and society even in the present as they multiply hypocrisy and self-deceit.

By denying new creation on all levels, simply to protect the ideology of free will, reality is denied simply to have a false face of stability in which present belief systems that rely on a concept of free will can survive. That false stability is made to seem to produce morality to seem that the whole is an honest paradigm of being righteous. The individual deceived free will exists for men keeps saying “I have free will. I have free will.” while their actual environment closes in on them and they have not received the grace of God’s presence in them.

Over time, those institutionalized in the lie of free will grow afraid of new creation even as a concept and see it as their enemy. They are forced to deny its very existence as an ideological argument in order to carry forward an agenda of making everyone believe free will actually exists for creatures; the other definitions of parts of reality rarely mentioned that must be defined a very particular way in order for human free will to make sense are zealously guarded by adherents of free will based religions and philosophies and new creation destroys them.

Free will theology is not simply a religious phenomenon or a thing which only has religious implications. It applies to politics and society in every area as a stunting of creativity and as a xenophobia of creation, while claiming to be the sole path to personal salvation before God and economic prosperity. Yet it has as a ridiculous slogan “the entrepreneurs will save us” as if depending on the very change that destroys their carefully built morality in order to build future economic prosperity. As long as that change has new definitions in place that seem to mandate free will, all is well to maintain the illusion. But if not, the change is decried as heresy.

Calvinism is proved to be the honest truth of Jesus Christ that can be tested and found to be true over and over, even in the midst of new creation and ever changing environments, be they ideological or physical.

To change the definition of money necessarily changes the morality surrounding money, which bumps the table on which free will morality is busy faking righteousness and thus effects one’s eternal place of abode in those models .. but has no effect on Calvinism.

The present popular definition of money and trade is based on scarcity; not new creation of plenty. The idealized environment in which to keep the present definition of money in the public mind valuable is then static and one of artificially maintained scarcity for a supposed public good. The notion of fairness within the definition of money is also based on ‘spreading around’ what is idealized to be scarce and the whole farce of equality within those paradigms is destroyed by the simplicity of new creation in Jesus Christ: when every has Christ who is the source of life and new creation, no one has a need to maintain an assumption of a scarce product one must run out and buy before it runs out as a political paradigm and merchants who rely on a civil-rights/choice based marketing scheme are undone. The whole evil show is based on non-creation and a near worship of lack of new creation in order to maintain a free market model of ‘scarcity dictates price” in order to keep prices up and business pumping.

To change models of government equally destroys the former security of free will based morality ..and doesn’t touch Calvinism

Advances in technology destroy free will based notions of morality and safety of soul based on that morality ( and that is why you never see such advances as products of nations in which free will based religions reign: they all want to think their own models of morality are eternal and don’t want any change ) ..and never touches Calvinism.

Why is Calvinism unchanged and unafraid of change no matter the amount of new creation or paradigm shifts? Being new creature in Jesus Christ and the common sense of on-going new creation is the truth of Calvinism; not merely theorizing about it or hoping for it. Embracing in whatever manner is necessary what is actually new creation as reality is then the Christian lifestyle and indeed, expectation. In contrast, as previously shown trying vainly to hold on to idealized self-built morality by supposed free willed protectionism in favor of the ideological items out of which that morality was supposedly built is the standard lifestyle of all who are deceived they have even partial free will.

Those who are deceived they have even partial free will cling to the past and call it Tradition; are afraid of new things and end up destroying their own lands and each other in a fight that must take place because of the falsely idealized scarcity of basic needs. In the midst of a world financial crisis, which those who are hard core believers in free will have manufactured through their ideology and consequent actions, new creation and acknowledgment of God’s on-going new creation is needed, not simply a rearrangement of what already exists ( usually termed “a fair deal for everybody” ) while an on-going denial of new creation and in denial of God in Jesus Christ is maintained. Both a quick look and in-depth research demonstrates that hard core free willers who call themselves pro-Christ but love the lie of human free will and loath Calvinism have been the destroyers and usurpers of all that God has formerly created other than new creatures in Jesus Christ / body of Christ and are solely responsible for the present destruction and international tensions according to their own definitions of reality. If one actually counts the Calvinists among them, one quickly finds there are none. At best one finds a constant hatred of Calvinism and a lie of that it is supposedly Calvinism’s fault that monopoly capitalism is unrestrained. One even finds the outrageous lie that Calvinism is the philosophical and spiritual foundation for monopoly capitalism when in fact monopoly capitalism itself is totally dependent on and is defined as artificially maintained scarcity. Monopoly capitalism could only arise out of a hatred of Calvinism, the lie of human free will and the consequent reliance on denial of new creation in addition to a false definition of stability that provides such practices upon which monopoly capitalism relies to exist at all under any guise.

A real world example: A group of people with a notion of false moral stability which is based on an idealized absolute lack of new creation will be terrified if anyone mentions changing the definition of money, even as they must deny that the definition can be changed at all. It is a rule that those who profess that free will exists for creatures always have an area within their ideology that they assume others will think is ruled by determinism. Such things as the definition of money, grace, public policy and the like are the sacrosanct definitions that are presumed to be untouchable and on a level with natural phenomenon over which no free willed creature is expected to have power over. A very clear demarcation exists within free will ideology itself between ‘what a free willed entity can do’ ..within the bounds of an unspoken and very nebulously defined determinism that is implied to be synonymous with God’s predestination and election. What is changed when the definition of money is changed is an idea in the mind of a vast population and the fear based on that idea.

Questions those deceived free will exists must ask, in their most honest moments include: Who will be moral in the new paradigm of the new money? How will that new morality be recognized? How will it effect choice?

If they are religious they will also ask: How will it effect being righteous in God’s eyes? Where are the rules to live by in the new paradigm so that the individual will know with certainty that one is a friend of God?

All such questions are a consequence of being in a lie yet living in reality, which is the fundamental condition of fallen men. Being busied with such concerns seems to them to be both common sense and piety. Yet to even dare to breathe such questions by them is an admission of a deeper outlook they have that makes morality unreliable and that they actually have a reliance on a vague notion of grace that must be applied no matter how changes come about or what those changes actually are. But the grace they rely on as an adjunct to free will is to them, by definition, something that cannot interfere with the idealized free will and thus cannot be new creation of the creature that has the idealized free will and cannot jiggle the table on which is built their entire house of moral cards.

In Christ, as new creature, one sees one’s own new birth as favor from God and thus a trust in God is immediate. New creation is then seen as both a friend and, as part of the nature of God, a standard part of reality. The grace of God in Christ is well understood to be part of new creation and there is no reliance on a static, non-growing, non-creating environment in which to assure oneself by one’s own moral code as one’s own witness that one is a friend of God. The very elements on which such a self-witness must rely are constantly changing and growing. God then is the only reliable witness and those through whom He witnesses.

Romans 8:16 The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit, that we are children of God.

What we see is that any notion of free will, no matter how small or large, whether it is called libertarian free will or partial free will, manufactures a fear of reality as xenophobia and a total lack of creativity in addition to a loathing of creativity in others. Everything must remain as it is idealized to exist for the sole benefit of keeping intact a particular ideology in order for those old in any particular version of morality to idealize themselves as keeping the morality they have earned by self-will and constructed out of unchanging, immovable elements. If anything changes about themselves as creatures or about their physical and spiritual environment as ideology, the morality they have supposedly so carefully crafted for themselves dissolves in front of them and as such, their salvation of soul.

The mixture of a few admissions that new creation may exist, but viewed as merely a shift or mere combination of in some part of reality that already existed added to an idealized static morality only produces hopelessness and fatalism. Such people end up as zealots of the slogan ‘live for today’, denying even more of reality in the guise of embracing honest change. They are enabled to be honest enough to face the truth that changes occur, but in seeking to hold onto a paradigm of self-constructed salvation of soul via a free will, are overthrown in the face of that change. At best, they must start over in a new free-will based religion working to earn ‘another’ salvation in ‘another’ morality.

The scenario described here is being played out right now. It could only work if the general populace are deceived they have free will. Arminian theology / Roman Catholicism / Mormonism/Islam and the like exist to produce the exact kind of person required to fall for the traps described below. If you are one of those people pushing free will as a debt trap in a liberal then conservative cycle, you would necessarily want a religious outlook that includes everyone to ensnare the most. Your version of unity, human love and brotherhood would then be nothing more than a bald statement that you want every kind of human being ensnared in your trap and all thinking alike with no exclusions. You want them all deceived exactly the same way to the same extent and the only way to do that is make them think they are being righteous and saving their souls to think the thoughts that keep them in debt.

In addition, someone has you doing the unforgivable sin as default religious behavior ( equating the Word of God with non-creating speech/Satan’s speech ) based on a false purpose of eyesight argument that basically says if you see anything, no spiritual activity is going on. That means when you read the Holy Scriptures they are not holy to you and must be will-neutral to all human beings by the mere fact you saw text at all or at best you equate your experince of reading them to others who say they read a holy text of a different religion.

Propaganda like the 60 Minutes piece on seizures plays directly to that deception. A man in one scene says “Even into the 20th century some people thought seizures were evidence of demonic activity” and then later on in another scene a doctor is showing a scan of a ‘seizure in progress’. Lights dance in a certain portion of the screen and the reporter leans forward and points to the lights and says “Right here? This is the seizure?” as if the mere fact she is seeing anything ( and you are seeing anything over her shoulder) and what you/she are seeing is being described as electrical activity in the brain, that is supposedly proof no spiritual phenomenon can be going on in front of you. Basically, it is propaganda to instill an automatic reaction that if you see something, by the definition of sight, it wasn’t spiritual. That way, a ‘scientific’ explanation can be put over the whole, which itself relies on non-changing physical laws that rely on lack of new creation. Put that in the arena of reading and no text you ever read is supposed to be doing anything spiritual to you just because you saw it. ..which is the classic arminian/free will take on interpreting the Scriptures: because they can read it and look at text, by definition to them means it has no spiritual power whatsoever and thus they are able to do what they call interpretation ‘on’ the text.

God’s take on seizures: Mat 17:15-21 Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is lunatic, and suffers sorely; for often he falls into the fire and often into the water. And I brought him to thy disciples, and they were not able to heal him. And Jesus answering said, O unbelieving and perverted generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I bear with you? Bring him here to me.  And Jesus rebuked him, and the demon went out from him, and the boy was healed from that hour. Then the disciples, coming to Jesus apart, said to him , Why were not *we* able to cast him out? And he says to them, Because of your unbelief; for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed , ye shall say to this mountain, Be transported hence there, and it shall transport itself; and nothing shall be impossible to you. But this kind does not go out but by prayer and fasting.

The Apostle Paul was said in non-canonical books to have had epilepsy as the “thorn in my flesh because of the greatness of the revelation given to me.”

A people soaked in that kind of lie and propaganda as a false purpose of eyesight argument just to keep forcing them to say they have free will are easy prey for the following scenario:

The current false definition of money as a measure of freedom

summary: the lie of human free will and its connection with totalitarianism: free will is pushed as an inescapable public paradigm in the midst of a manufactured cycle of Big Spending Government and then Fiscally Conservative Government specifically to bring about a public illusion of morally obligated debt whether or not one participated in that spending; that feeling of obligation is directly linked to a perception of free will and money as a measure, representation and controller of that free will as being the sole expression of free will within the political arena per the propaganda. The Conservative portion of the show is implied to be both the foundation of reality and goodness and the iron bars of moral obligation while the liberal/spendthrift portion is the supposed experience of freedom that you pay for later in a more moral and stable environment; ..planned, temporary destabilization periods followed by reaping the benefits of the sown obligation to induce slavery as the norm and the expected norm as public, defacto religion


The current definition of money in the public mind as a product of propaganda that is maintained 24/7 365 by all means possible is one of a measure of human free will as a power grab by those who keep up the pretense of human free will. They are deceived people really have free will, there is no Creating Word of God at all, much less as distinct from non-creating speech and thus everyone is in a fight over limited resources: what already exists. A way to ensure your own enrichment in that atmosphere and within that mindset/spirit is to continually aggravate another person’s attention span that they have freedom that they are not taking advantage of and if they do not use it they will lose it. All current advertising fits easily within that paradigm. You cannot maintain such spending-for-freedom or spending -as-freedom over a long period of time and maintain the flipside of money as a measure of something scarce: that anything is scarce. The scarcity is the only thing that makes that definition of money valuable on a long term basis in a free will paradigm.

Money is plainly seen as a representation of freedom/free will and the speed with which to express that idealized freedom. The lie of free will is preached from every pulpit that despises Christ, every advertisement, and from the large majority of persons in the public to each other. Indeed, to say otherwise than men have free will brings almost certain derision. In short, the population as a whole is attacked with the lie that they have free will at all and the further lie that they are not using ‘enough’ of it, that attack is perpetuated over decades and centuries, which induces feelings of a storehouse of freedom that one cannot express ( because the illusion is that the freedom is real and would ‘work’ somewhere other than in the circumstances one is actually in..) and that lacking that expression of freedom one is both falling behind others who are falsely represented to them as heroes of the use of the idealized free will ( false history ). In addition it is falsely assumed in that lie that one has a valuable part of oneself that is not and cannot be used without an empowering mechanism. Money is the favored mechanism that is represented to them to be a tool the free will uses to express itself: it cannot be used alone but is meant to be used in public and thus becomes an automatic proof and evidence from one free willer to another that they have personal power and as such are ‘legitimate’ human beings. Above all else, free will is represented to be the default state of human beings, whether one liar says God forced it on us or another says evolution forced it on us. Money then becomes the mechanism of both proving to others that one is in the same default state of others and is therefore ‘really’ human and ‘belongs’, but also as a defense mechanism whose power grows with the amount spent.

The phenomenon of women loving to shop for things they don’t actually need but are merely trendy is easily seen as an enslavement to the need to supposedly express free will in the most benign way available to them. No one has to be confronted per se; items bought are a passive proof of personal power over objects. What is important is that the idealized freedom that is pretended to exist at all times is expressed even if on a kind of automatic behavior cycle that is piggy-backed on buying of items of necessity. The lie of free will in every way is loved by all merchants; is the fundamental paradigm of all advertising; is the reason merchants support very particular religious organizations.

Credit is not the equivalent of grace

Th notion of credit is then an easy enslaving device to those whose best honesty is that they have free will: one gets to supposedly prove the free will and the defense mechanisms of purchasing are kept intact; one stays ‘included’ in a world-system and thus supposedly proves worthiness to be considered human in public, while the money is imputed for a time as if it were the equivalent of grace and thus had as friendly a face as the god of the false grace free will preachers preach.

Times of big spending are then pushed as a public/governmental paradigm and when those deceived into debt on the premise they were exercising a freedom-on-a-timer have sufficiently fallen in the trap to keep them subdued until a large debt is repaid in the future, then a more conservative paradigm is pushed wherein the exact morality upon which the notion of free will depends dictates they remain in debt and do whatever behavior is required to pay it off even if they were not a beneficiary of what was spent. The liberal/wild spending spree followed by a more conservative outlook on that same implied freedom is a means of control that enslaves those deceived they have free will even if they are the party who profits monetarily and with, in essence, free labor from the cycle. The supposed persons in charge and who loan the money are afraid of those now in debt based on an understanding of reality that is entirely inside the definitions of reality that force the existence of free will as common sense; they are just as enslaved as the others.

The political cycle of Democrat/liberal/spendthrift followed by Republican/conservative is for the most part, a single group of people manufacturing such cycles and seeks to ensnare by government fiat the whole population regardless of whether or not one is a spendthrift or deceived by the lie of free will simply by participation in trade with money at all and being a citizen.

The massive bailouts of huge corporations that mismanaged their assets proves that an implied fiscal genius has nothing to do with who will be rich or poor but only those who pull the strings of a machine founded on the lie of human free will and who perceive their personal safety and safety of soul to stand or fall on concepts of free will. Business to such persons is merely a front wherein they define what is legitimate like franchises with no regard for morality or Christ while seeking to portray that Business is Christian by definition ..of human free will. It also served as propaganda to instill in the minds of the populace a paradigm of who-has-the-money are the Rich and whoever owes the money are the Poor as a moral paradigm regardless of actual morality. Drug lords and pimps can be legitimately rich in such a mindset and maintain their grip over populations and force children into their respective slavery with impunity. What is called justice and concepts of fair play is all based on the false scarcity that is necessary to maintain the notion of lack of new creation and thus the possibility of human free will.

Everyone knows that the massive portion of the funds loaned by the government went to those already wealthy and for the most part banks. That was no secret because it was never intended to be a secret. It was intended to be known in order to imply a seat of power wherever the money ( and by implication, the free will ) ended up and to make that power known as defacto god that forced all citizens into debt and who are now supposedly morally obligated to pay back those funds under a coming more fiscally conservative but in truth anti-Christian government with idealized higher moral standards founded on an idealized human free will, even though they never received any value for the money they supposedly borrowed or profited in any way whatsoever. According to false preachers and false prophets God or evolution forced free will on everyone, and suddenly an invisible wave went through the population and all the free will ended up in a Very Big, Heavily Guarded Vault that belongs to a select few. Literally, if it lives in the US, per the paradigm, it owes and specifically owes those who engineered the whole propaganda. Even to be the one who is owed they need the lie of human free will, in order to appear to be independent agents. It doesn’t do an aspiring slave master any good for the target population to know with certainty that they all only owe God in Jesus Christ and that there is no free will.

Those same persons have in past times maintained the concept/lie that free will exists and that it can be traded from individual to individual. Such phrases as “pool our sovereignty” ( in quotes gives 11,500 hits on Google ) and the like imply free will exists and can be given away, taken or traded as a commodity. Indeed, many have attempted to define victory in war as the taking away of a certain threshold amount of free will from the enemy, at which point the enemy is said to collapse. Money in such definition and debt schemes is then idealized as part of the propaganda to be the very device that takes free will from one and gives it to another thus being in the eyes of the deceived a measure of their own free will as well as yardsticks in supposed economic warfare.

If they owe money, they supposedly owe free will. That such phrases are spoken in other areas than debt is simply a bid to legitimize them by appealing to a supposed universality of their application; everywhere free will can theoretically exists ‘there the proofs of humanity are’ is simply an implied shorthand for ‘everywhere you are, since you have free will, you are in debt’. So-called pooling free will for good purposes as activism and charity are the favored legitimizing topics. Even then they are hypocritical as the causes they champion are anti-Christ. But having supposedly washed them morally by presenting them as the strength behind the will to give and be a charity, their definition of money then acts like a glue going through the target population and taking all the idealized free will from everyone who handles money at all. Even when you know you didn’t receive any bailout money and don’t have free will they must imply you are still a slave to keep their paradigm in place to control others.

The Democrats are there to get you into implied debt with credit; the Republicans are there to make you feel morally obligated and to make you feel that saying you are in debt is the ‘right thing to do’. Right now they are running a ‘values’ campaign while the implied debt piles up. The ‘values’ are never stated outright but generalized to be ‘fiscal responsibility’ coupled with a vague implication of ‘honesty’. The ‘values’ turn out to be responsibility for the actions of others in the guise of being the ideal citizen: taxation without representation and monstrous social policies mandated because we supposedly ‘pooled our free will’ in a credit cycle and now must obey the Ones Who Are Owed.

The lie of human free will is the road to self-induced totalitarianism by that very means. It slowly becomes the best honesty of the people who then are deceived that economic enslavement goes hand in hand with the salvation of their soul.

Jeremiah 9:4-8  Take ye heed every one of his neighbour, and trust ye not in any brother: for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbour will walk with slanders.  And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, and weary themselves to commit iniquity.  Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the LORD.  Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, Behold, I will melt them, and try them; for how shall I do for the daughter of my people?  Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; it speaketh deceit: one speaketh peaceably to his neighbour with his mouth, but in heart he layeth his wait.

Colossians 2:6-10  As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:  Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.   Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.   For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.   And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

  1. No comments yet.
  1. March 23, 2012 at 10:20 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: