Home > Calvinism, cult of scarcity, Governance, results of non-creating speech and the logic therein, Ways of God > Free Willer Science versus actual reality: Global non-warming?

Free Willer Science versus actual reality: Global non-warming?


English: non-warming   ..note that non/’lack of’/’not’ is the first part of a left to right reading experience and is plainly understood.

Russian: без потепление. same thing..

Spanish: sin calentamiento. same thing..

Arabic: دون الاحترار. ( first part again  except you have to read it right to left despite the period being on the right.. part of the problem of mixing English with Arabic in the same post and trying to mix grammars to appear ‘correct’ to English readers.. )

Chinese: 没有变暖. Left to right. Could just as easily put it vertically and read from top to bottom..

Hindi/Devanagari: वार्मिंग के बिना. left to right… the real meat of the understanding is underneath the line.. but the word spoken and written to seem to describe environmental phenomenon the way ‘warming’ does in English is actually the first character and the ‘lack” / non- is the last character. Underneath reverse thing going on here ..if you come from English, Arabic, Espanol or Russian toward the rest of the world. Chinese is its own thing because written representation of words expressed as functional pictures can have things over, under, to the side and with all kinds of connecting lines that alphabet based languages do not.

No matter where you go, how it is spoken, in what writing style it is placed or the intricacies therein it is plainly understood by those within that distinct speech to say NOT WARMING in addition to being very explainable to others who don’t speak or write those languages as their native tongue. That understanding is at least as universal as the weather in which those who live in those languages as a spiritual meta physically live.

But for those in the lie of free will, which includes most people on the planet, the mere presence of theoretical free will trumps the facts and truths that everyone understands and even understandability itself.

What good is a theoretical free will if you can’t use it, right? And you must use it to preserve good things for later according to all its hype.

example:

A commercial for a candy bar: people standing around on an ice sheet eating the Famous Brand Candy Bar whose label is printed in six languages and whose jingle is “No matter how you say it, no matter where you are.. it comes out Mmmmm Delicious””.  Russian guy. Chinese guy. Arabic guy. American. Argentine guy. All standing around in severe cold weather gear on the Antarctic ice sheet eating said candy bar.  Every now and then the American guy can be seen wearing a hodgepodge of other nations gear because someone told him it would be warm in Antarctica by the next time he was there. Chinese guy is missing a glove. Russian guy isn’t wearing his usual scarf. etc..  All are obviously enjoying the Candy Bar. New episodes have each person say something to rest to the effect of how much they are enjoying the Candy Bar in a language not their own with the effect that non-native pronunciation has in various situations. That could go on for years.  They could get to be friends after mis-perceived slights were gotten over.  They could even make fun of each others career advancements of being on other commercials. “Uri, that was a real manly shave you did on camera for the Razor Blade Company.”  says the Chinese guy in English with appropriate accent. “It was almost as good as your macaroni and cheese commercials, Mr. Li. ” says the American in bad Spanish that he thought was perfect Spanish and said very confidently toward the Chinese guy. But through it all, they remained friends and held on to the truth of the good taste of Famous Brand Candy Bar. Guys vacationing off Cancun, deep sea fishing off Florida.. eating that candy bar. The whole group get gigs on other commercials, etc..

Then, after the Board of the Candy Company is infiltrated by Democratic Party operatives, the commercial changes one day, after a Board meeting in which the operatives say “Let’s hire Micheal Moore”:

There they are, all standing around munching on Famous Brand Candy Bars surrounded by the new equipment their success and fame has brought them. New snowmobiles ( one each!)  after the season of the-one-that-wouldn’t-start and they had to survive on candy bars for six weeks. “What time is it Ahmed?” asks Uri. Ahmed digs through layers of clothing and then holds up his wrist: “I don’t know.” he says with a smirk. “Let me check my new Rolex with the eXtreme weather alloy band.”  Suddenly, the music that is supposed to signal a rescue of  victims begins. Micheal Moore is crouched behind a snowmobile talking with the Executives. “Cut!” is heard and the Model Men take a break.

Micheal gives them a new commercial with the same props as the old commercial. Uri quits. Argentinean guy quits. No one is happy.

“Roll tape!” The Guys standing around eating Famous Name Candy Bar, asking what happened to Uri and Pedro. Suddenly, Mr. Li spits out the candy bar he has been chewing –and smiles. The others follow suit at various times. Close-ups of half-chewed candy bar bits on the pristine ice and a penguin kicking at them. The commercial ends with “Preserving the enjoyment for later! Its the right thing to do.” across the screen. As the new commercials progress, we see the Guys eating less and less and finally, not eating the candy bars at all but dreaming out loud about getting to a place in their lives where they could all eat Famous Name Candy Bars and how they are going to accomplish that religiously and politically. Uri is walking along a street in Moscow and is suddenly ambushed by Micheal Moore who demands to know how, in good conscience, Uri can eat the Candy Bar when other people are sacrificing to preserve that great taste for a better day. They know that if they eat it now, it will cause the Antarctic ice sheet to melt! And you know that too!” Uri is made to look like a selfish fool ..on film.

One day on his blog, Uri says bluntly: “How are you supposed to sell candy bars if no one is allowed to eat them ? What is wrong with eating a great tasting candy bar?” He is sued by the Company for defamation in US courts and the Company wins. Simultaneously, the Company gets a Fifty Billion dollar bailout from the Fed because it’s political rhetoric isn’t selling candy bars: it wanted the money as if it had been selling the candy bars all along at a fantastic rate and the Democratic party wanted to give them the money that was taxed away from non-Famous Brand Candy Bar eaters under any pretext for being politically correct.

The point?

When it comes to science, the free willers always ends up ..lying.. simply for the ability in their own mind to provide rhetorical opportunities in the future to pass themselves off as experts on ..something. That they have no control over what they do or say is not within the bounds of their best honesty in their most serious and/or religious moments.

Truth is reality. It is as simple as that.

True science is to understand actual reality and does not hide from God. It is not there to simply pose questions and pass off the mere posing of questions as the heart and soul of science in the pretense that the investigation as a mere (supposed) expenditure of free will for the sake of feeling personally powerful is the science while the truth is ..something else. What is plain is plain.

If you think that is a scary paragraph, a kind of dictatorship of truth / Jesus Christ over all reality ..it is. To be ignorant is one thing; it is even part of the truth of you and me on many levels. To act / pretend ignorant/ignorance on what you already know to be truth is a lie. Lies always have the consequences of lies. Lies as pretended doubts do not have good consequences and are not at all a proof of ‘good science’ or ‘thinking like a scientist’ to impress your friends and family.

Any sort of investigation into reality that is the mere tool of a theory of free will always ends up lying and destroying. The Communists and Socialists under Mao and Stalin looked into theories of free will and supposedly found a truth that worked for them as an open platform to simply keep talking in a political and religious arena. The result was that they murdered millions of persons and stunted the mind of a whole generation of persons that is only now beginning to get over a fun swim in the intricacies of the lie of human free will.

The Global Warming scam is the same: it is a platform for political and economic manipulation on the theory of using part of your free will now to save future-free-will later.

That is not being responsible. That is being a liar and hypocritical.

The foundation of the lie of free will is that supposedly, God forced it on you and you can’t escape it. If you are a fake scientist, then you have to believe “evolution” forced it on you and you can’t get out of actually having free will. Either way, you are going to have to say lies such as ” not choosing is a choice” simply to get the word and keep the word ‘choice’ ever present in your own mind on the premise it is already understood as permanent truth in other people’s minds and that they manufactured that certainty for themselves and therefore you are behind. Saying you have free will is playing catch-up to what you have been deceived is everyone else’s best honesty and is performed by the demons whose names are popularity and inclusion in an umbrella demon called Lying. Lying with the alternate literal of the truth called science,  is just a way to at obtain a falsely idealized minimum level of what other people have already got as intellectual tools ..to preserve the falsely idealized free will.

If you can’t escape it and if it is so obvious that those who say there is no free will are such idiots, then why is all the time inside the lie of free will spent taking desperate measures preserving the ‘free’ part of the lie? If you can’t escape free will, how could you possibly “preserve it” for yourself? Why would you need to? Supposedly, you can’t get out of it even after death according to the religious side of that lie.

That is such an obvious question and reveals the absolute hypocrisy of the lie itself in the mouth of its most zealous adherents that the demons in them go get the word/spirit/demon  “paradox” and spew him out vigorously as supposed evidence of ..something.

Those who are not and never even pretend to be experts on the foundation of their own common sense ardently and just as desperately take the same steps to “preserve” the ‘free’ will for future uses. They supposedly put off  ‘the preferred choice’ now so they can still do ‘choice’ at all later. Thus they stumble along doing what is in their own eyes the less preferred thing hoping to be able to do the preferred thing later on with the freedom that was theoretically preserved by their former actions. That is why the Jews and many others walked to the trains going to the death camps: on the premise that they were using part of their free will to preserve the rest of their free will for a better day.

Those that bought houses in these last few decades, stretched the budget, bought as many of the things the magazines and trend setters told them would make their house more valuable in the eyes of a potential buyer and were barely getting by? Did all the things the insurance company said to do to protect that investment? That was, in their own eyes, the “responsible steps to take” ..to preserve the free will for a better day by skimping on what they actually wanted to do. While they were being deceived and being embittered, other people were preserving the free will for later politically, scientifically, and religiously so as to destroy the worth of a house ..especially if the worth of that house was seen in terms of how other people’s free will would react to it. An economic model in which houses are to be lived in as a permanent home as opposed to being ‘an investment’ and meant only to be bought and maintained with an eye to be sold later is much more stable than a pre-conceived dependence on other people’s free will to ‘give you money’ for doing all the trends and for having always done the less preferred thing in your daily life so you could add another trendy architectural widget to a house. But even those who did the less preferred thing as a supposed act of their free will ..that wanted a house to be the permanent place of their residence were undercut by the demons who manipulate the thoughts/demons of the lie of free will in others.

Both are the case: no one recognizes the little sacrifices that were a bitterness as lifestyle because the housing market is bust. Because jobs are still melting away and no one can afford to pay for their neighbor’s bitterness-as-lifestyle. So everyone who has a bitterness as lifestyle outlook wants their neighbors to be forced to pay for their own bitterness on the premise that that is just the proof of being civilized. It is a plain statement of “I was bitter so I could be happy later. I have free will and used my free will according to all the best ways I knew. So you have to pay me for being bitter in the past so I get the reward that my religious and political outlook said would be there if I constantly did the less preferred thing.”

Because there is no free will, the storehouse, that place where all the good things were stored that had been ‘saved’ as every person was taught to slight themselves a little everyday in order to be trendy was empty in each individual life when they looked to spend a little of the “savings”. The whole economy, all of science and religion was turned by demons into a Big Bank in the eyes of the deceived and the clerks of it that were busy marking out and taking the bitter road now so everyone could get to the place where the free will would be ideally free to do the non-bitter things later.

Of course, someone noticed they were bitter and that they were being dragged along in a public spirit ( a single spirit, one spirit, not many independent free willed beings that keep coming to the same conclusion and the falsely idealized independent status of each functions as proof to all the others..) of bitterness and that the bitterness was being represented to be the highest type of civilization; the best possible intellectual and spiritual achievement. Those that didn’t get houses –at all– were being forced to do the bitter thing in their own lives as if they were going to get a house by having done them and as if they then would have a share in the ‘public free will piggy bank full of savings’ that would one day appear.

The effect of all that?

What did the demons in them do? The demons made them love bitterness for its own sake and as the sole evidence of having obtained the idealized highest “responsibility” and most “civilized” lifestyle. No end of bitter-er-than-you actions as supposed preservation of the free-will-for-later-use were set up and embraced as the road to happiness:

Lying science as a lifestyle for its own sake in addition to the lie that it actually delivered good things..

Abortion as a national lifestyle for its own sake in addition to its being functionally advertised as “poverty insurance”..

New religions and cults that denigrate the soul and spirit for its own sake. The more bitter the better. The more emotional negatives as ceremony as “denying oneself” the better..

Immorality and law breaking was and is held forth to be the temporary solution to the bitterness on the theory that such never tapped the ‘savings’; a little taste of what spending the savings before the Big Day would be like..

All of them are just their own bitterness and compound the everyday bitterness.

Bitterness is all the rage in the guise of that bitterness bringing happiness later on. And the evidence that the supposed perfect model of behavior actually results in the advertised outcome of an environment in which the will could express all that saved freedom? Movies. Art. Political rhetoric. Fictitious works made to merely keep saying the Lie of human free will. Manipulation of scientific and religious doctrines with mathematics to supposed ‘prove’ the piggy bank is full and will remain full ..if ‘the people’ can be held to the bitter model of behavior their highest ideal of ‘responsibility’ with more demonic speech.

If a little bitterness is called a little responsibility and a little savings, then a lot must be Big Responsibility and Big Savings? If a small preservation is good, a bigger bitterness to preserve more free will must be better? Sidestepping of course the absolutely hypocrisy of needing to preserve something you cannot escape because God forced it on you and that you will supposedly keep after death so that heaven can be portrayed as that place in which all your free will savings can be spent and hell is that place where all the people who ‘wouldn’t’ do bitterness end up.

So: the particular bitterness that is the impetus for this post:

The Antarctic is not-melting.

photo via wikipedia and scaled to fit..

photo via wikipedia and scaled to fit..

Global warming is the political manipulation of the bitter lifestyle and to add to the bitterness. That lie that is just helping you maintain as an ever present totalitarianism in your mind that you need the bitterness as proof that you are in fact on the right path to the piggy bank decades from now when you retire? That Mini Meta Lie within the total lie of free will that encompasses all weather, all climate, all ‘natural, God-independent, morality-independent’ phenomenon? That Big Lie that is always claiming to have found independent verifications of its logic in every nook and cranny of physical reality? It’s proofs are not proofs and the opposite of what it claims is actually taking place.

The Antarctic ice sheet is mysteriously not-melting. It is not going through the consequences of your free willed actions of enjoying something; it is not melting at all. And it needs to melt to provide the evidence if the world was getting warmer, AND that warming was your fault “because” you have free will –and can’t get out of having free will —  and so as the reasoning why you need to do the bitter thing now to save all your happiness for later.

In fact the antarctic ice sheet is getting larger.

From: Antarctica –warming, ice melting –not yet: who quoted  this article from Ice Stories, a website of scientists on the ground in Antarctica, in addition to others:

While the uptick now is interesting, the real news is the change in extent. Quite a difference from 2008, about 1 million square kilometers more than this time last year, and well above average. The gain in Antarctica extent this year is 2 times that of the gain in the Arctic at 500,000 square kilometers.

Since the wisdom in the press headline is that “Antarctica is melting – sell the beach house”, but we see Antarctic ice increasing, one can only conclude that like Steigs upside down thermometers, we must also have upside down ice sensors, and the ice is actually less than last year. I’m sure somebody can prove that statistically.

Or, the headlines could just be bullpuckey from the press. Which is it? Inquiring minds want to know. If you need a look a how the media spins the melt season in Antarctica, look no further than this CBS News report from Scott Pelley.

No doubt this “anomaly” will be scrutinized by the Advocates of the Bitter Lifestyle  who will need to crunch some non-creating numbers to explain this ‘glitch’ in their ..lie. No doubt their media advocates will print millions of non-creating words that are the demonic cousins of the phrases “Scientists don’t understand why this is happening.” and “Good science is about good questions. This anomaly certainly brings up some good questions.”

And no doubt a person deceived they have free will will say “But if no one has free will, the same thing would have happened anyway!” as a offshoot of the common sense of the lie of free will and on the premise that the outlook of those within the lie of free will is reality.

But in truth it would not have happened if those who were deceived they had free will had a different speech than that which they have. Determinism and fate turns into fatalism only when seen within a speech that cannot create anything because the details of that speech  seem to mandate human free will as a logical circle. The truth that their speech cannot create anything and is powerless is stretched to say that it is also will-neutral and non-living is the only speech in total reality so that they seem to have at least an environment in which the free will might exist.

If they had known that Jesus Christ is not at all a love puppy of the human heart, not-a-pussy when you need strength for war, and is not at all to be understood in a speech that can create nothing but that He is Creating Speech and that the life and common sense of life within God ( all of total reality) is such that He will constantly create more and that there is no need and is in fact sin to live in a lifestyle of bitterness they would not even understand why in the heck anyone could possibly say that a lifestyle of bitterness was the only moral thing to live, even though they would understand the difference between Jesus Christ/Creating Speech and Anti-Christ/non-creating speech. They would look at God as many righteous persons have done, with profound lack of understanding at why He had made some to live within absolute destruction and think it wisdom and they would understand:

Romans 8:18-27  For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.  For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.   For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,  Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.  For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.   And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.   For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?   But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.  Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.  And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.

You would understand that evil is indeed a work of God and while a mystery as to ‘why’ is plainly revealed to us on an everyday basis.

Ecc 8:8  There is no man that hath power over the spirit to retain the spirit; neither hath he power in the day of death: and there is no discharge in that war; neither shall wickedness deliver those that are given to it.

2Thess 2:7,8  For the mystery of iniquity already worketh: only that he who now holdeth do hold, until he be taken out of the way.   And then that wicked one shall be revealed: whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: him

Many hasty righteous persons have seen that and said to God “What have you done?” as trying to squeeze all of Him into the partial understanding given to us even seeing that understanding growing day by day and minute by minute.

Job 40:6-8  Then answered the LORD unto Job out of the whirlwind, and said  Gird up thy loins now like a man: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.  Wilt thou also disannul my judgment? wilt thou condemn me, that thou mayest be righteous?

But those in non-creating speech who have not heard God, who think it obvious common sense to be independent from God in order to ‘freely choose Him’ and give God permission to be Truth had to have a speech that was not-God in order for that to even seem to happen. And that non-creating speech has consequences, only one of which is to prefer bitterness as the proof of righteousness and morality. That speech has the same consequences everywhere, in every person and in every subject of which it speaks.

The difference is plain. In Christ you will have plenty and enough to give away because He is always creating in you and through you. In anti-Christ you will have to pretend that you can get the same thing as true Christians receive and that it is always just up ahead if you live a bitter lifestyle now and can get everyone else to live the common sense of your own speech and outlook of non-creation and therefore scarcity.

No matter how you read this post, even in what to English readers is backwards/right to left or bottom to top, it comes out the same And no matter what is said in any speech, those who God has ordained to live and die eternally in non-creating speech and the lie of human free will can only think that is it is logical perfection to think that it makes no sense whatsoever to think anything other than all men have free will and the common sense ( conglomeration of   the little lies that make up the big lie)  that is That lie of free will.

Jermiah 23:21-32  I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.  But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings.  Am I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off?  Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD.  I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed.   How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart;  Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.  The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD.   Is not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces?  Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour.   Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith.  Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Advertisements
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: