The Lie of Free will is a circle of forced vanity
..you want to keep proving how free and powerful you are for the specific purpose of being able to keep proving it to yourself in the future. In fact, a functional medical definition of death is used by the death cults as not performing an arbitrary amount of such idealized freedom for oneself: if one cannot seem to prove to others who are in the lie of free will that one is at least thinking of future choices, one is idealized as “might as well be dead” and “imprisoned in a shell”. Supposedly, one has to ‘keep’ making hundreds, thousands or even billions of ‘decisions per second’ to seem to have lived or keep living a full life: one has to ‘do’ what robots are idealized to be doing philosophically in order to supposedly distinguishing oneself ‘from a robot’.
The ideology/spirit of the lie of free will exists to serve itself and for no other purpose. It forces an outlook of fear of what might exist outside its own confines, forces a delight in itself as a deception, while forcing the notion that nothing is being forced and that the will is ‘choosing’ to be free as the only way to know one is alive. Those in the lie of free will are not joking: they actually think they have free will. That deception is their best honesty. But it does none of the forcing as being the same forcing as truth: truth forces reality. God is truth. He created and creates all things to include good and evil. ( to include the non-creating language He broke up at Babel in which the lie of free will could make sense and be articulated to explain things in lies..)
Deception forces the deceived to hate reality and truth and thus to hate God and love the deception as supposedly loving oneself; as the definition of loving oneself ( supposedly ‘admitting’ one has free will and rejoicing thereafter in that idealized freedom).
The lie of creatures having free will carries with it a lie that nothing is forced; that every thing is at the mercy of personal choice. In fact, everything about the lie of free will is forced and forced vanity that exists only for its own sake as an ideology: to ‘keep’ itself as ‘free’ as the rumor said it already was just to ‘do it’: to keep on keeping itself as an ideology ‘free’.
Psalm 94:11-18 The LORD knoweth the thoughts of man, that they are vanity. Blessed is the man whom thou chastenest, O LORD, and teachest him out of thy law; That thou mayest give him rest from the days of adversity, until the pit be digged for the wicked. For the LORD will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance. But judgment shall return unto righteousness: and all the upright in heart shall follow it. Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity? Unless the LORD had been my help, my soul had almost dwelt in silence. When I said, My foot slippeth; thy mercy, O LORD, held me up.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Inflation versus Inflation
There is the inflation that is defined as paying more for the same goods simply because more monetary units have become available. If everyone has those monetary units, then the price tends to go up just because of the presence of those ‘extra’ units. Everyone has more; they don’t care about spending more to tread the same water.
That is monetary inflation that has to do with the availability of the physical representation of the definition of money. That type of inflation devalues the very representation of the definition of money on which it relies: you have to spend more of it to get the same result. Those with less numbers of units of money pay the price in less goods and services available to them. That is usually called “poor people get less.” by those whose concern is to make money look like a arbiter and proof of fairness.
Then there is monetary inflation that has nothing to do with the amount of monetary units available. It is the inflation that begins at the boundaries of morality and implies money can measure other things than necessities. Money paid to whores, gambling money, liquor money, bribe money, dishonest lawyers and law makers, etc, is an inflation of money’s importance as lie that kills people. The money is falsely believed to be a proof of value of experience because of its reputation to be able to purchase food, clothing, guns and shelter. It is moral misdirection on the assumption that the definition is “a physical representation of units of free will”.
That kind of inflation can only exist among a population of people deceived that free will exists for creatures and is the default state of being for human beings. That usually ends up being expressed in the speech God broke up at Babel as “It’s just the way things are.” ..by those most interested in establishing that population in order to mine it for death and catastrophe.
Based on that inflation, law makers, just as the owners of casinos and whore houses, supposedly are not in any way responsible for what they enact as policies expressly because someone got paid with the idealized ‘honest representation of value’. The money has become a shield to wicked policy makers on the basis of an assumption of the power and morality of money.
Yet money built on immorality is worthless. Even if you get it, everyone knows it is dishonest and therefore untrustworthy.The people that set up that ‘new money’ will merely be destroyed by the same means they used to destroy the bankers before them. No matter who replaces them, that money itself is evil and everyone knows it.
Everyone wants the Moral Money to actually spend in a safe environment. Everyone wants the money that is tied to unmoving morals and that therefore holds its value in everyone’s mind. You can say you have money all day long, but if it is not the money with the good reputation, you got nothing. Monetary inflation as expanding what the good money can buy, devalues people, the money and God in the minds of those who have it. That was its purpose. It was never intended to actually bring stable prosperity.
Proverbs 21:3-7 To do justice and judgment is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice. An high look, and a proud heart, and the plowing of the wicked, is sin. The thoughts of the diligent tend only to plenteousness; but of every one that is hasty only to want. The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death. The robbery of the wicked shall destroy them; because they refuse to do judgment.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Classic cult mentality: the larger the number of people who say they like something, the more credible that something is
To that end, no excuse is out of bounds to simulate numbers, be vocal about number of actual supporters, use any trick, lie any lie or manipulate any statistic to inflate the (size? perception? deception of having ‘more’ free will?…) of one’s personal belief; the whole supposedly validated because of the supposed power of someone else’s belief in that same or similar paradigm. It’s the ‘if the other guy says its real, it must be real ‘way of life.
You –never– hear real Christians say “I’m going to heaven because 10,000 other people said they have similar beliefs as mine.” or “I’m going to heaven because archeology proves the Bible to be a historical document” even though the Bible is historically accurate and there are many Christians. Yet it is the constant refrain from atheists and anti-Christians of any sort to to hold up popularity, real or imagined, as the sole proof-of-concept of their paradigm. Thus they always looking for ways to make something popular and their way of doing that is to tweak someone else’s supposed free will.
This article at Measure of Doubt “Why this Meme Exploded” is a classic case of that mentality: it brags about “tapping into tribalism” and such to get ‘likes’ on a facebook page as compared to Campus Crusade for Christ’s facebook page. The whole article is a supposed how-to ( in idealized free will ) of making “a meme” go ‘viral’ while implying but never stating “go viral among a population of people deceived they have free will”. They even posted a link to the wikipedia page on “social proof dynamic“. They should have entitled the page: “How to capitalize on Satan’s former work deceiving others that they have free will to manipulate behavior at their expense for your own fun and profit .. er, for social change.”
From the article:
I found myself thinking, “How the hell did that happen?” And then thinking, “Hmm… how can we do it again?”.
…
I had to figure out why a simple picture like this inspired such a big reaction. The more I thought about it, the more psychology and rhetorical communication techniques I saw present. Kenny:
- Demonstrated insider status
- Invoked tribal/patriotic feelings, and
- Gave people direction.
Well look at that. In classic style, he hit the three branches of rhetoric: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.
He no doubt doesn’t see himself as in a cult, but as smartly deciphering his future among a population of other ideologically free willed units.
That meme is to be distinguished of course, from inserting a new word or phrase into common speech and other people picking up that word or phrase in their common speech. These kids, as the next generation of victims of the lie of human free will –just like Campus Crusade for Christ– want to brag about the idealized presence of a historical phrase and notion, long established, getting some attention as proving its credibility as a belief system. The game, as with all liars, is to mine unsuspecting persons who have congregated in large numbers to get reactions and claim those reactions are proof of your other lies once you’ve got some sort of history to reference as your ideal behavior for your cause. They are the ones whose speech got hacked and they are bragging about having hacked facebook for “likes” ..with that speech. No understanding of God having hacked their speech at Babel is in their discourse or an understanding of the consequences of being in that speech.
You can only know that God actually did that to human speech and that human speech is not God’s Word if you are no longer inside human speech. You can’t get Out of human speech unless you hear the Word/Voice of God/Jesus Christ.
In the end, every belief system that is free will based is false and must resort to such efforts by Satan through them to pretend to be validated by the theoretical use of others people idealized free will. What you are watching, even in political campaigns, is every group of free willers hiring a witch to manipulate others into thinking “lots of other people think like us” ..on the basis of the lie of human free will. The other people are idealized as having the qualities a unit of free will ought to have to be the ‘good side’ of that lie: heroic, smart and humble about it. The lie of free will has its own “left behind” manipulation: you will supposedly be left behind if you fail to vote for them, either on facebook or at the polls. Mormons specialize in those tactics as their religion; others less adept but not born again in Jesus Christ do so by base default.
Also in the end, they will ‘do’, as solving real problems in the world, exactly what idealized ideological units of free will always have done: nothing. But while they are doing nothing, you will hear no end of bragging about what great things their free will is about to do next. They will tell you by many means that if you are wise, you’ll join them in that bragging and doing nothing.
But it’s not as if nothing happens if you are deceived and believe in lies. You end up destroying yourself and your family, going to the lake of fire and don’t even know why. All you will care about is manipulating others before they manipulate you until then.
Proverbs 21:10 The soul of the wicked desireth evil: his neighbour findeth no favour in his eyes.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
The underlying non-creating measurements of the Global Warming ..and Wall Street Occupiers lies
Good article over at s8int.com ( the blog ) on the hoax of global warming that points outs the temperature difference that the earth is supposed to have warmed is distorted by even larger errors in the temperature taking apparatus and locations. Taking the ‘earth’s temperature’ in order to get a foundation for whether or not ‘it’s temperature’ is said to have risen has been riddled with fraud and abuse by those who financial interests are now riding on alarmist scenarios of doom and conservation. ( think “carbon units” as forms of cash in certain circles whose value goes to nothing when everyone understands –and admits– that global warming was always a hoax to make money. Carbon units are those invisible things supposedly found in the soil of farms that change their practices in accordance with alarmist policies –they get paid cash to say carbon units are real and can be exchanged like a commodity… ) The article doesn’t explore the money angle, but does a good job questioning the so-called science.
Determining a mean planetary temperature is not straightforward, but an extremely complicated problem. Even the best data are suspect. Anthony Watts and his colleagues have surveyed 82.5 percent of stations in the U.S. Historical Climatology Network. They have found – shockingly – that over 70 percent of these stations are likely to be contaminated by errors greater than 2 deg C [3.6 deg F]. Of the remaining stations, 21.5 percent have inherent errors greater than 1 deg C. The alleged degree of global warming over the past 150 years is less than 1 deg C.
Yet even in a technologically advanced country like the US, the inherent error in over 90 percent of the surveyed meteorological stations is greater than the putative signal. And these errors are not random, but systematically reflect a warming bias related to urbanization. Watts has documented countless instances of air temperature sensors located next to air conditioning vents or in the middle of asphalt parking lots.
The ideology being attacked by the Wall Street Occupiers and their defenders as well as the ideology being put forward by them as a legitimate replacement is equally dependent on false measurements of things that don’t exist but that they hope to implant as new monetary items. The old fraud is being attacked by a new fraud that relies on the same underlying definitions ..that are all false. Who got measured by money to say they were poor? Why was someone measured by money at all? Why is Wall Street being treated like they are the Real Power behind the “Economy” as if they ran the country and were therefore worthy of being attacked as a source of problems? On a certain level, the Wall Street Occupiers are doing Money Mongers the same favor the environmental witches are doing the established energy corporations: they make more valuable the commodity when they attack its distribution and who controls it at present. It is only a short step to say Hope is a commodity. After all, it is invisible and can’t be actually counted, so you can always inflate or deflate the “amount” and therefore manipulate the price , just like “carbon units” and “jobs created per dollar spent on The Economy”.
The whole of both movements is an appeal to some super class of persons waiting on the fringe with all the solutions to step in and “save the day”, not as destroying the underlying lies on which those problems are forced, but as making them functional Forces of Nature it is heresy to question. Those persons are just witches who even now are agitating simple persons on the basis of the lie of free will in the speech God broke up at Babel and for the most part, as their version of Christianity that does the unforgivable sin as their default piety. Their non-creating speech that is not the Word of God can only drift from false measurement system to false measurement system and blame some other people for their own non-creating measurements.
Isaiah 48:1 Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the LORD, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness.
Proverbs 21:5-7 The thoughts of the diligent tend only to plenteousness; but of every one that is hasty only to want. The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death. The robbery of the wicked shall destroy them; because they refuse to do judgment.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
The Lie of Free Will as the Christ-hating False Gospel it actually is 101
Isaiah 48:1-10 Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the LORD, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness. For they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel; The LORD of hosts is his name. I have declared the former things from the beginning; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I shewed them; I did them suddenly, and they came to pass. Because I knew that thou art obstinate, and thy neck is an iron sinew, and thy brow brass; I have even from the beginning declared it to thee; before it came to pass I shewed it thee: lest thou shouldest say, Mine idol hath done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, hath commanded them. Thou hast heard, see all this; and will not ye declare it? I have shewed thee new things from this time, even hidden things, and thou didst not know them. They are created now, and not from the beginning; even before the day when thou heardest them not; lest thou shouldest say, Behold, I knew them. Yea, thou heardest not; yea, thou knewest not; yea, from that time that thine ear was not opened: for I knew that thou wouldest deal very treacherously, and wast called a transgressor from the womb. For my name’s sake will I defer mine anger, and for my praise will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not off. Behold, I have refined thee, but not with silver; I have chosen thee in the furnace of affliction.
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation ( a choose Jesus gospel of any sort ): God doesn’t make people robots! We can choose! We’re rational creatures! Calvinism makes us robots and robs us of our dignity! Whosoever WILL! Whosoever WILL!
Christ through a Calvinist: In what speech do your accusations make sense?
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: What?
Christ through a Calvinist: The speech God broke up at Babel or in Christ as the Word of God?
Advocate of free will based non-creating salvation: What the hell are you talking about? Whosoever WILL! Whosoever WILL!
Christ through a Calvinist: The speech God broke up at Babel can’t create anything. A reliance on non-creation therefore makes sense inside it. Christ is the Word of God by which all things were created. He creates us as new creatures by speaking to us.
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: What?! No ,no. We go under the water to get born again. Whosoever WILL! Whosoever WILL!
Christ through a Calvinist: even your master the devil knew that the proof of Jesus Christ being the Son of God was creating speech. The first thing he asks in the temptations is to see proof of creation by act of speech. Don’t you know the difference between God as Word, Jesus Christ and human speech that God broke up at Babel?
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: I have no idea what you are talking about. Whosoever WILL! Whosoever WILL!
Christ through a Calvinist: saying that men must choose to believe what they hear God Say accuses God of being the same speech that God broke up at Babel; the speech that can’t create anything at all. That’s the unforgivable sin.
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: You are not making sense within the paradigm of my argument. You are not sticking to the script!
Christ through a Calvinist: No. I’m not. I’m making sense in Christ who is the Word of God. Thanks for finally answering the first question.
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: Oh! I see! You are a mere rationalist! You want everything to make sense! What we believe is the mystery –not certainty! Whosoever WILL! Whosoever WILL!
Christ through a Calvinist: God as Word creates what He speaks. The Bible is the creating Word of God. Your accusations only make sense in a theory of speech that exactly describes the speech God broke up at Babel. You have to assume the Bible is powerless, non-creating speech in order to think you have power over it and idealize others to have power over it and what they hear. While human speech certainly cannot create anything, and you are well used to it such that creation as act of speech seems like a myth to you, God calls all those in that speech you speak wicked and liars. To wit:
Psalm 12:2-4 They speak falsehood every one with his neighbour: with flattering lip, with a double heart, do they speak. Jehovah will cut off all flattering lips, the tongue that speaketh proud things, Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail, our lips are our own: who is lord over us?
and
Psalm 58:1-6 Is righteousness indeed silent? Do ye speak it? Do ye judge with equity, ye sons of men? Yea, in heart ye work wickedness; ye weigh out the violence of your hands in the earth. The wicked go astray from the womb; they err as soon as they are born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder which stoppeth her ear; Which doth not hearken to the voice of enchanters, of one charming ever so wisely. O God, break their teeth in their mouth; break out the great teeth of the young lions, O Jehovah
So I ask you, Mr. Satan worshiper: why is it that your thoughts of God’s Word are derived from the qualities of human speech that God broke up at Babel? Why is it you think all speech has the qualities of your speech and cannot create anything? Don’t you see you need a will-neutral, non-creating speech that God Himself is a prisoner to in order for what you are saying to make sense? Don’t you see that what you are saying is that the only speech in total reality is the one God broke up at Babel and that God, Satan and men are all prisoners of that speech as their sole means of communication? Don’t you see you are saying Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God that created all that is and ever will be ..can’t create anything and you are then equating Jesus Christ with anti-Christ?
Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: Look here. I’ve been patient. But you are out of your mind. The Bible clearly says Whosoever will.
Christ through a Calvinist: No. I’m in the mind of Christ. But I am certainly out of your mind and do not at all think as you do.
Significant silence ensues..
Finally Advocate of free will based, non-creating salvation: My gospel gets the prettiest girls, the fastest cars, more money and the biggest buildings. I tell ‘em they got the power to save themselves and they all worship me.
Christ through a Calvinist: Both you and they will pass and be forgotten. And God will save some out of your lies. In fact, everyone who has ever been saved has been saved out of the lie in which you live by a different speech than what you have got. By the way, those desires you have and give to others that they never get satisfaction with? You know why they don’t get what you seduce them to want? God creates between the line of sight of first seeing the desire and the object of desire. New time. New things. New thoughts. New everything. They don’t get the catastrophe you said was coming or the salvation you said could be had. By the time you encounter that object or idea again, you and they would have forgotten you wanted it to avoid seeing you can’t do what you say. No matter where you turn, or how hard you try, that new creation keeps getting in the way of your evil thoughts while you are not newly created and have to make up lies as to what happened. But in that speech that God broke up at Babel, you will lie until the day you die in the common sense of non-creation. And you’ll just re-hash the lies of bigger witches than yourself and call their books your proof-texts.
The only reason people are deceived by your philosophical lies about speech you imply but never state are only because they are in the same speech you are: the speech God broke up at Babel. You prophesy by Baal/Belial/non-creating speech/anti-Christ. But I am in the Word of God and have the mind of Christ. You and I are not the same creature.
John 1:1-14 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. *He* was in the beginning with God. All things received being through him, and without him not one thing received being which has received being. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light appears in darkness, and the darkness apprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, his name John. He came for witness, that he might witness concerning the light, that all might believe through him. He was not the light, but that he might witness concerning the light. The true light was that which, coming into the world, lightens every man. He was in the world, and the world had its being through him, and the world knew him not. He came to his own, and his own received him not; but as many as received him, to them gave he the right to be children of God, to those that believe on his name; who have been born, not of blood, nor of flesh’s will, nor of man’s will, but of God. And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us (and we have contemplated his glory, a glory as of an only-begotten with a father), full of grace and truth;
1Corinthians 2:9-16 but according as it is written, Things which eye has not seen, and ear not heard, and which have not come into man’s heart, which God has prepared for them that love him, but God has revealed to us by his Spirit; for the Spirit searches all things, even the depths of God. For who of men hath known the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? thus also the things of God knows no one except the Spirit of God. But *we* have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is of God, that we may know the things which have been freely given to us of God: which also we speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, communicating spiritual things by spiritual means . But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him; and he cannot know them because they are spiritually discerned; but the spiritual discerns all things, and *he* is discerned of no one. For who has known the mind of the Lord, who shall instruct him? But *we* have the mind of Christ.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Fifty Five percent of human communication is non-verbal? Body Language? Secret honesty? wow.
This is what happens when people are inside a deception that they have free will, yet other people can’t perfectly control that will in specific instances. People in that same deception want to believe they can defend themselves against the wiles of other peoples idealized free will. So they give what they say is an instance of hidden honesty in others, accidental admissions of the body as witnessing against the soul inside of the other person as supposed proof of their own discernment and ability to protect themselves in order to validate the lie of free will itself. A ‘what is in my mind must be in all minds as the default sight’ type of thing. A”don’t you want to agree with the pretty girl?” thing.
————
A recent claim on Fox news that 55% of human communication is body language would be in line with their past attempts to portray themselves as experts on that topic. Not content with merely saying it on air, they thought they would provide a more in-depth look at that supposed fascinating topic. The bottom line of that type of supposed analysis is that emotion is the key to honesty and certain emotional ques can’t be faked as facial expressions or body attitude. The underlying attempt is to make emotion the new science with women as interpretors.
Of course, women are rather famous for being easy to deceive and coming up with fake ways to discern their new maturity in which they are continually duped while keeping them vain and proud.
Girl 1: See that? No wrinkles on her forehead. She’s faking something.
Girl 2: You right. I saw that right away and knew something wasn’t right, girlfriend.
Man off to the side: So we can really tell if someone is guilty by their forehead wrinkles?
Girl 1: O yeah.
Girl 2: mmm hmm. Gotcha.
What they are essentially saying is that non-creating speech as verbal communication is just as effective to create something as gestures. In other words, nothing gets created –ever. What we are supposed to glean from the supposed insight about body language is that since no new creation by acts of speech is expected –that would include creation of wisdom– all that is left is what is being called emotional authenticity. If your speech doesn’t fall in line with their ideology, then you are supposedly inauthentic and your facial expressions will supposedly prove it. That they are inside an spirit they never understand: they just want to force you to agree with them to be pleasant as if they were in no spirit but were in a meta speech shared by God, Satan, men and women.
Inside of all that nonsense, they are supposed to decide if they like Mitt Romney’s economic plan, Rick Perry’s national security plan, Obama’s abortions and the sale of US citizenship to foreigners, a certain football team, what colors go together for Christmas dinners and women’s fashions with all appropriate detail. Wool or cotton? Blue or mauve? Does that purse really match those shoes? Is it rude or hypocritical to disagree with Mormon or Michele Obama’s fashions? Was that or was that not a wrinkle?
You are supposed to follow along if you want to impress the girl. That’s how scientology, mormonism, freemasonry, psychology and psychiatry got started. Women didn’t want to hear anything other than the speech God broke up at Babel. Instead of Christ, they wanted to hear everything was a knowledge issue that they could control themselves via something called ‘free’ will. That’s the definition of
prophesying by Baal ( Belial ).
It was all a joke. And then they put people in asylums and through supposed exorcisms that didn’t follow along with what they were saying. To this day they drug many of the populace on the premise that the the heroine, the crystal meth, the cocaine or the ‘legal’ pill will bring the victim more in line with the nonsense. Mostly women and effeminate men that thought it was fun to think emotional authenticity was a real anything.
What does Fox news do for an encore? Have a casino owner ( in their parlance “an employer” ) in as if he is a legitimate business man so he can do some honesty about Obama’s class warfare lies. That is an old tactic against Christians: have the devil speak an honest bit about political grievances as if he is the common man and has the common man’s interest at heart. These are the same guys who make tv shows about Vegas and the bad guys in the show are the ones trying to ‘rip off’ the casino while the casino plies the gambling junky parents with alcohol, whores and ‘entertainment’ while providing day care for the kids in a ‘safe and clean environment’. In the parlance of the lie of free will “watch responsibly”.
They denied Jesus Christ and found a strange sandbox to play in. You can follow along on Fox news and all the MSM inside that same spirit of what is called defense issues and political analysis.
People in that ideology/spirit think Jesus Christ fasted because he thought he was losing; that there is no such thing as a celebratory No Thank You.
You win saying no thank you.
You do not win rising to the challenge of learning the new maturity in non-creating speech. Even the devil knows that new creation is the proof of righteousness, not reveling in scarcity and hoping to blindside yourself out of scarcity with ‘luck’ and emotional ques. The proof Satan asks for as proof of Jesus Christ being the Son and Word of God is creation by an act of speech, not interpretation of body language or ‘employment’. Satan got creation, just not what he asked for: nothing that would save him out of his own mindset and non-creating speech.
Matthew 4:3,4 And the tempter coming up to him said, If thou be Son of God, speak, that these stones may become loaves of bread. But he answering said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word which goes out through God’s mouth.
Proverbs 24:8-10 He that deviseth to do evil shall be called a master of intrigues. The purpose of folly is sin, and the scorner is an abomination to men. If thou losest courage in the day of trouble, thy strength is small.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Why Mitt Romney is not a Christian and is not fit for the office of President of the United States
Luke 16:13-15 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him. And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
Mitt is Not Fit and is not a Christian because he does the unforgivable sin as his default piety: he thinks God, Satan and man have one large meta speech which all must equally share and on that basis, those who “get and do” will-netural, holy information go to heaven because they are smarter than those who supposedly got that same idealized will-neutral, holy information and ‘didn’t do it with a free will’. Mitt is ‘freely willing’ that his Book of Mormon be placed side by side with your Bible and both viewed as human speech with each having “different but critically important insights for us all”.
Mitt Romney worships human speech as if it were the only speech in total reality. He thinks the book of Mormon trumps the Bible in the end and that all divine communication is made in human speech; that because the Book of Mormon is newer than the Bible it is more up to date within the free will paradigm. By default he denies Jesus Christ is the Word of God , was the pre-Incarnate Word of God before he was born of the virgin; thinks there was no confounding of human speech at Babel by the Word of God.
Mitt thinks God is a hapless God who can’t control who believes in Him; can’t help but be believed in by any passer-by and once believed in has to give the believer gifts and blessings. Mitt thinks that because he is deceived he has personal free will and can choose his own beliefs and god. In Mitt’s mind, other people have something called free will ‘too’ and that idealized free will of man forces God to give gifts to whoever asks for them once they say they believe in him. And anybody at any time can say they believe in him in human speech and force God to comply.
In Mitt Romney’s mind, God can’t create by His acts of speech ( because human speech can’t do that ) and ‘thus’ resources are scarce and must be fought over on that basis. That is in fact the root of what Mitt Romney and all his followers and everyone who believes what he believes of their definition of conserva-tism: why anything needs to be conserved or preserved.
Mitt believes monetary coins and pieces of paper are representations of units of free will and that contracts, buying and selling are supposed proofs of free will and are sacrosanct meta beliefs that trump all else; are a force of nature that came from ..somewhere and cannot be escaped. His entire religion in structured around maintaining and mining human behavior in those deceptions.
Mitt doesn’t know that such things are just false ideology or that those who make up and maintain such definitions practice occult arts to control others by that very means. He doesn’t know he is just the latest dupe to be their spearhead in American politics even as they tell him he is one of them and is an inside man. So when Mitt speaks of Jobs and The Economy, he means jobs and the economy ..within a political paradigm that religiously maintains the sacrosanct character of the lie of human free will, the current populist definition of money, and a political paradigm that seeks to raise commerce to the level of religion and personal salvation.
In fact, Mitt is exactly as much a Christian as Barak Obama. They have identical beliefs about reality. Neither believe in new birth in Jesus Christ, though they are deceived they have deceived everyone else that what the freemasons and shriners call new birth is the same as new birth in Jesus Christ. They both are deceived that identical creatures will be in heaven and the lake of fire, or some other opposing paradigm of good place/ bad place, but each will have earned placement by their idealized free willed actions. Both say they are Christians and both prove they are not Christians by their lifestyles and practices.
Mitt Romney is not a Christian at all. He is not a Christian because he is a Mormon and is not a new creature in Jesus Christ. Mormons are not Christians, but are an occult group that hates Christ ( the Word of God ) even as they appropriated his name for their evil. As a group they will do anything to worship the lie of free will and the current populist definition of money as its representation and anything to keep that definition in place in order to keep what they have invested all their hopes and prayers on being valuable in even non-Mormon minds.
What good does a “personal and private” definition of money do them when they want to practice their idealized free will with you and all their emotional common sense is tied up in ideally being able to do so? With ‘everybody’ on that basis. They, with a host of other groups just as deceived as themselves want to do all they can to force their definition of money and thus “the economy” ( that supposed Thing in which “money gets done” and in which “free will is demonstrated” ) on you to keep themselves wealthy in their own minds. That’s why they would love to “give you a job”. That way, you can “participate in their definition of money”, be a swell guy or gal, and be just as much a slave to Satan as they are.
If you are not a Christian and are reading this: you are on your way to the lake of fire minus new creation in Jesus Christ. If you have been born again by hearing the Word of God, then your definition of money is not based on scarcity, there is no particular satisfaction in buying and selling for its own sake and you know there is no free will. You know there is no emergency as is claimed by those who are deceived free will exists and thus no amount of money spent or trade done will satisfy what is called “getting over the emergency”. Further you plainly see the manipulative character of the lie of free will and its control over every aspect of the lives of those who claim to have it. Further still, you see the claim of crisis as nothing more or less than a experiment to see how to control people in some new way ( that will end in death ) with the lie of free will and its auxiliary lies that deny Christ and deny any distinction between the Word of God and human speech.
If you are a Christian you also know that the media report on political events with a slant to enhancing the populist definition of money and commerce as a representation of free will and proof of having done “free willed actions” and anyone they call a viable political candidate will be in lockstep with those paradigms.
If you are a Christian then you know that Jobs are recast and reported as Hope and a spiritual salvation of sorts to that specific end by those calling Mitt Romney a Christian. The whole question coming out of that media lie is “how are Americans going to be put to work?” And that is from the so-called conservatives as well as the left. They are already planning on you clamoring for a pogrom in which you are forced to do as you are told ..with a ‘free will’ of course.. and that you call that enslavement “the salvation of America” and that you will stand for it as long as you get idealized representations of free will as money with which to practice the lie of free will in an economy of like deceived people in exchange.
The farce of hoping someone else will get a job, even lots of someone elses so as to constitute a bloc of ‘the economy’ in order to prove the free will paradigm of jobs and The Economy worked ..somewhere .. has run its course and been exposed as farce. They have already proved they can’t ‘dispense free will’ by handing out money. Yet it is all they have to offer and can only regurgitate the same thing over and over with the same fruit. Every last one of those who are saying you need to be rescued into their paradigm of “Jobs equals Salvation” are portraying Jobs as the gold coins Hindu priests throw to the crowd in various ceremonies and for which your neighbor will trample on you to gain in his rush to believe in and validate his own free will in front of others who share his deception.
Those saying Mitt Romney is a Christian are saying that is ideal conservatism.
No. That’s just Mormonism. Paganism.
It isn’t as simple a thing as betting on football and then getting the crowd and the opposing team to believe the object of the game is to tackle the left guard at all costs; that the ball essentially has no meaning while the actual rules get enforced to win the game. But that’s one way of describing what they do: hustle the crowd by theater to get the crowd to desire to see the left guard tackled and to actively boo if it doesn’t happen. They see themselves as hapless victims in someone else’s game, but ideally having a free will, get to manipulate the crowd and players to cash in with the bookies. That is essentially the Mormon religion: do whatever it takes to gain the land and homes while everyone is watching for other manipulated desires that have nothing to do with Jesus Christ. That is also one definition of witchcraft.
In truth there is no game, no free will. Witchcraft in the end is pointless but real. It is vain. You all crush each other in your rush to validate your idealized free will with the few trinkets free willer priests throw out while vehemently arguing the pros and cons of Mitt Romney’s supposed Christianity within false argument of love and fair play you have been given for the purpose.
You go girl.
Jeremiah 9:3-6 And they bend their tongues like their bow for lies: but they are not valiant for the truth upon the earth; for they proceed from evil to evil, and they know not me, saith the LORD. Take ye heed every one of his neighbour, and trust ye not in any brother: for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbour will walk with slanders. And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, and weary themselves to commit iniquity. Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the LORD.
——————————-
My dad is in the hospital right now. His ammonia levels were elevated ( 59, normal is 35), and the pain meds they were giving him ( hydrocodone 5 mg plus 325 acetaminophen ) for his hip and back pain were not being processed by his liver as fast as a person with a healthy liver. He has a ten inch GIST tumor in his liver that is growing. So his liver can’t do what a normal liver can do, even though he wasn’t taking as much pain medicine as he was allowed per the prescription. The upshot is that that has made him somewhat mentally unreliable for several weeks. He hasn’t slept, until in the hospital, a single five or six hour stretch in months, but gets 20 minute cap naps here and there even though he is in bed most of the day. He is a sick man.
I’m used to both his nonsense and the sudden lucidity he evidences but hides in a pitiful, manipulative state of mind. The request for water ..when it is right by his hand. The request to help him stand up, even though he can stand up perfectly and walk on his own. “Can you adjust my pillow?” …again. The fact that if he grabs something for support as he walks, he will gravitate to that object and then panic himself into falling while grabbing onto it more desperately and crying for help. But when told to let go and just walk, he walks perfectly. The statements that he needs to go somewhere and do something that is nonsensical. The fact that he pretends ( or actually ) to forget things about himself, but remembers other people’s ideology perfectly for them ( as in, he reminds others of what they believe in surreptitiously, hint by hint.) in order to manipulate on that basis for a glass of water he could get himself with much less trouble. He could just reach over and get it. I’m used to his reliance on words as if he had no limbs; his perfect recall of other people’s ideology and his suspect forgetfulness of his own; his thoughts of making a prison break out of whatever is hurting him into my ideology to get a glass of water.
My Dad is a Christian, but that spirit in his flesh is a lying son of the bitch that organic changes in cellular structure let out. If you have a particular problem with that understanding, perhaps you can answer why particular word orders evidence themselves in people only on drugs, in sickness, why some people say they need to get high, take a drink etc, to flee from the reality before them and once they have taken that drug or drink immediately start to say different things than their normal discourse that are very particular things; that in fact are part of a conversation they take drugs and drink to keep participating in as part of the definition of addiction; the same verbal stuff that elevated ammonia levels, hydrocodone and sleep deprivation unleash as particular sentences that are grammatically correct statements in the speech that God broke up at Babel and have the flow of a conversation in some sort of detailed knowledge. And in the middle of all that, they can still function on a certain level, be aware of what other people believe, have a conversation with that belief system in other people …that makes some sense and some nonsense.
But even my Dad, in his sickness, in his pretense of forgetting about himself but remembering his version of Jesus Christ in me, still knows better than to vote for a Mormon.
Several visits ago he asked me if I had a pair of scissors when I first walked in the room. He had been lucid to that point for several days. I asked why he needed a pair of scissors. I’m thinking he needs to trim his nose hairs or cut a string off his pajamas. He has one hand on his foley catheter while he looks around and then whispers “They’ve implanted a device in me to force me to vote Mormon. I’m gonna cut it out.” He called me an ass for saying it wasn’t so. Several times. More than several times.
You can’t make this stuff up. I leave the weather channel on or a ball game when I leave his room now. No more news.
You can’t reason with non-creating speech, drunk or sober. Everyone recognizes that as “you can’t reason with a drunk person.” and then forgets it when it comes to sobriety. All human speech wants to do is keep saying its words repetitively to hear itself speak and manufacture its own version of desire. It says its a Christian with regularity.
My Dad is coming out of what constitutes Mitt Romney’s spiritual outlook on life in Mitt’s most sober moment. My Dad had to be attacked by drugs, cancer, sleep deprivation and back pain simultaneously to think something resembling Mitt Romney’s normal thought processes; even then he knew better than to vote for a Mormon.
That’s not a joke. My Dad has medical records to prove it. Mitt Romney has media analysts, the Book of Mormon and Mormon bankers.
Mitt Romney is not some super-villain. He just has never been actually born again in Jesus Christ, yet thinks his speech is god and is the common sense of God. No amount of therapy, threats, medication, compromise, conversion stories, money, children, loss, gain, economy, land, power or humiliation will help him.
God says the wicked, which includes Mormons, can’t hear God. That means they cannot hear God in you. It means they worship anti-Christ as the anti-Word of God and call him god. That spells disaster with a capital D. They can’t hear you; politically or otherwise.
1John 4:5,6 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
————————
Isaiah 63:17-19 O LORD, why hast thou made us to err from thy ways, and hardened our heart from thy fear? Return for thy servants’ sake, the tribes of thine inheritance. The people of thy holiness have possessed it but a little while: our adversaries have trodden down thy sanctuary. We are thine: thou never barest rule over them; they were not called by thy name.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
The Deceptive Experience of Human Language and Being
A short video several years old I moved to a different server. I’m in the middle of re-making old videos and making new ones.
Islam, False Determinism and Kufu
Islam and False Determinism as both idealized freedom from political and spiritual oppression by unseen spiritual enemies …and the resulting Kufu
False determinism is that lie that claims to be a factual revelation of God’s will and the nature of God as God when God is conducting affairs concerned with what He Himself created. These include human affairs but are not limited to human affairs.
In Islam, the nature of God as creator is factually represented, but in a speech which itself can create nothing and as if that creation ended at some convenient time in the past leaving the ideal Muslim free to do as they please in the present. Thus the endless threats, motivational speeches and twists in Muslim societies that make the sloganized signs of the Free Will Bible Belt Christian Churches look positively quaint. Their choices in the present are then said to be the key to future amounts of free will they supposedly receive if they do what they are told by the religious specialists who, at least in theory, know more about the idealized determinism than their neighbors. Just like the Free Will Bible Belt Churches.
Case in point: the idea of Kufu, sometimes called compatibility-in-marriage. Who can marry whom.
The religious specialists are specialists who, it turns out, are really only good at protecting their specialty. What better way to protect one’s specialty than to say who can marry into it? It is one thing to need new adherents as the old ones die. But in free willed religion, you need a certain animal to not rock the boat by having to be trained in the rudiments of the new religion in such a way that would never ask the questions that a native in those rudiments would never think to ask either. You need a bare minimum yes-man or yes-woman that you can move forward with that has a certain threshold of shared beliefs about reality, not someone with whom you have to make all your lies make sense when viewed against the backdrop of their former deceptions. How do you prove to someone who thinks Shiva is the all-merciful that in fact Shiva doesn’t exist and Allah is the all merciful? They are willing to concede that it may be true, because, well, the woman they wish to marry is really, really pretty and her father has lots of money. He just needs a little nudge.
After all, because they all live in the lie of free will and that money is a measure of that exact free will and if this Allah guy can give him a little more freedom than Shiva ( is that mercy or what?) then that god is in fact the mecrcifulest. So the title is up for grabs in the overall paradigm of Free Will and Money-as-Freedom. Just answer a few simple questions and after that the new adherent is saying “Where do I sign?” and “Isn’t she beautiful?”
But those few simple questions are the rub. How do you get the other guy out of cage he isn’t really in but thinks of as real and he is saying he is trying to reach out to you through the bars and that reaching through those bars is painful for him? In his mind, he is offering you a real olive branch at the cost of personal sacrifice. Look in his eyes. He ain’t kiddin’. All you have to do is say it is real while preserving the integrity of Islam.
Those pagan-to-other-pagan converts can be tricky.
“So there I was, dashing through the Koran, searching out compatibility issues. I gotta tell you –I was sweating bullets. But then, as if a revelation, I saw in the sky, ..not a bird, not a plane, but faster than a speeding bullet. It was kufu. It said this guy was too dumb to convert and that would bring saddness to his children once they were married. His mind wasn’t right. Is Allah the most merciful or what? I told him it was pre-determined by God that our families were incompatible, the proof was that he had put us in different religions and occupations and that because Allah had halted creation in order to preserve everyone’s free will, that had the side effect of limiting resources, one of which was beautiful women from my family who possessed a certain liberal mode of thinking. So while the wonders of Allah’s demonstration of powerlessness were wise, ( is he not, not ashamed to shame himself for our benefit?) in that that powerlessness provides the stable character of our environment in which to have free will and not be interfered with by new creation, unfortunately that results in sacred scarcity (on which we rely to know what is valuable), but also that there are some things of which there just are not enough to go around.
So the guy looks at me like I’m a moron and says that I have claimed for Allah what Shiva wrote about herself/himself ( I’m not sure. I don’t recall what exactly he said on that.. ) thousands of years before Islam ever existed. Can you believe that?! I was glad he got mad so the whole thing was off. But still , I mean. C’mon. Shiva? Can be as smart about and as merciful with her powerlessness as Allah? What? That’s the same thing the Catholic missionaries tried to say about Mary. These guys never quit! Kufu is truly a miracle defense!”
That false determinism is set up to as a defense for free will is without question even as the pretense is that free will and determinism are diametric opposites and one excludes the other as controlling arguments in other arenas. There can be no new creation within non-creating notions of determinism right now or free will is ruined. The exaltation of the powerlessness nature of false gods goes hand in hand with the lie of free will: they claim to have created all that is, but have halted all new creation so that supposedly, men can decide for themselves whether or not they would prefer to live in paradise or be roasted in a fire for all eternity. The rules for supposedly proving one’s decision on that are simply broken down like franchises in which non-creation and scarcity are claimed as benevolence to know what is valuable.
In the end, Kufu is simply a stab at claiming determinism is interfering with or at the least guiding free will in such a way as to both claim to have free will and yet not be responsible enough with it to upset the emotional rules between men in that common free will economy.
“My daughter or son can’t marry your son or daughter because determinism is involved.” Kufu is nothing more than a shield for Arabs and Hindus to get out of being called racist while promulgating Islam or Hinduism with a landlord mentality and not be seen as regarding those who convert as automatically inferior.
In seeing it as such and wanting to not be seen as racists, what is the point of continuing in Islam when it no longer helps you protect your family from objectionable marriages? The very protection invokes resentment in the ignorant anyway because of your other lies on free will. Playing the game of “determinism ( which is really non-creating determinism and is a lie ) is forcing my free will on this one issue but leaving me and you free in other areas” and merely calling that ‘determinism’ by another name so as to appear not have motives but only be a victim of the gods isn’t working out for Islam or Hinduism and the only recourse they have is to be violent to appear to have some valuable trait as supposed strength. In the end, you were just a person trying to protect your family from bad marriages by the means of a type of emotional nuclear option that no one would question and excuse you from the normal rules of human emotion combined with non-creating speech and the lie of human free will.
It is much better to see that for a time, God forced you into a false religion, protected your family as a unit by the means of that false religion while not at all excusing its actions in you, and now saves you out of that situation and saves your family as well in new creation in Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God. That false religion and all the spirits of it will go to lake of fire.
Jeremiah 16:11-21 Then shalt thou say unto them, Because your fathers have forsaken me, saith the LORD, and have walked after other gods, and have served them, and have worshipped them, and have forsaken me, and have not kept my law; And ye have done worse than your fathers; for, behold, ye walk every one after the imagination of his evil heart, that they may not hearken unto me: Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night; where I will not shew you favour. Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that it shall no more be said, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; But, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither he had driven them: and I will bring them again into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Behold, I will send for many fishers, saith the LORD, and they shall fish them; and after will I send for many hunters, and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the holes of the rocks. For mine eyes are upon all their ways: they are not hid from my face, neither is their iniquity hid from mine eyes. And first I will recompense their iniquity and their sin double; because they have defiled my land, they have filled mine inheritance with the carcases of their detestable and abominable things. O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit. Shall a man make gods unto himself, and they are no gods? Therefore, behold, I will this once cause them to know, I will cause them to know mine hand and my might; and they shall know that my name is The LORD.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Flash Fiction/Parables: Taking Poisonous Candy from Babies
I have a desire. Quick! What should I do with my free will?
Joann wants to marry a Muslim man. After all, he gets welfare from the US government and oil corporations in the form of university scholarships, cash and jobs. He gets tractors and gasoline to grow heroine with and infrastructure contracts in Pakistan to lie to the CIA. He gets free schools in his village; free medical and dental all around. But she is not an Arab or a Hindi. He lives such a cushy life. Everybody wants to give him something. Even democracy. Her family has created jobs in the past for other people. She has never received welfare. Heck, her family paid it to others. What of Nikah and Kufu?
Ah, my daughter, not to fear. Remember and live by the golden saying of Ahmadi Bawadi. “Any person, particularly any Muslim who gets what they want is undeserving of heaven. Desires corrupt the heart; particularly desires accomplished. Man is wicked and needs only the guidance of Allah. Any other is a distraction. So it should be with holy women. Think of the happiness of your family.”
Mark 3:24-26 And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand. And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
